ArticleFrontiers in public health2024
Management of rare and undiagnosed diseases: insights from researchers and healthcare professionals in Türkiye.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrative and systematic genomic approaches to improve diagnosis in rare and undiagnosed diseases: results from the RareBoost project.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- The rare disease tree: adolescent voices, family narratives, and health professionals' views in Greece.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Main Recommendations for Developing Education and Awareness Strategies for Rare Diseases: Scoping Review.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Systemic barriers to rare disease management in conflict zones: insights from a refugee with sturge-weber syndrome in Sudan.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Diagnosis, treatment and management of rare diseases (RD) pose unique challenges due to their complex nature, significantly impacting the daily experiences of researchers and healthcare professionals working in this field. Despite increasing awareness and progress in the field of RD worldwide in recent years, a significant gap remains in our understanding of the specific barriers that these professionals face in their work with RD. This study provides a detailed survey analysis that sheds light on the challenges that researchers and healthcare professionals face in diagnosing, treating, managing and conducting research on RD. Methods: We developed a national online survey with three RD stakeholder groups (Researchers, Healthcare professionals and researcher-healthcare professionals) to identify the main challenges and needs in Türkiye for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up processes of rare and undiagnosed diseases. Results: The survey was completed by 363 participants, revealing that participants face key challenges such as the need to refer patients to specialized centers, financial burdens, limited access to necessary tests, inadequate support for rare disease research and a lack of interdisciplinary collaboration. Participants also noted that RD are inherently difficult to conduct research on with small cohorts. Survey results also suggest a number of policy improvements to accelerate research on RD: increased funding, establishment of robust surveillance systems, and development of comprehensive national action plans and guidelines on RD. Discussion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to be conducted in Türkiye. This study contributes to the understanding of the needs of professionals in rare disease research and highlights the urgent need for system improvements to support them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.