ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2024
Case Report: Button battery ingestion-an underestimated emergency in children.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Urgent X-Rays in Children With Unexplained Haematemesis Help Rule Out Button Battery Ingestion.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In general, the battery-related emergency department visit rate has continued to rise in the last decade. We present two cases of previously healthy toddlers (14 and 24 months old) with unwitnessed battery ingestion, who presented with massive, hematocrit-relevant hematemesis. Initially, both children showed stable vital signs. Following a symptom-free interval, both had a recurrence of massive hematemesis, which could not be controlled despite a multidisciplinary approach with pediatric, radiology, ENT specialists, endoscopy and anesthesia. Pathological workup showed necrosis with secondary aortoesophageal fistula due to battery-induced colliquation necrosis caused by caustic soda produced at the minus pole. We conclude, that preclinical risk scores, excellent clinical pathways (e.g., from Children's Hospital of Philadelphia) and detailed approaches from the National Capital Poison Center in the USA and also the European Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) offer clear and concise instructions for the management of button battery ingestion, but clinical awareness for vascular complications must be heightened. A multidisciplinary treatment algorithm for this fatal complication should be implemented and trained in pertinent hospitals. Moreover, it is of great importance to raise awareness for button battery ingestion in educational campaigns for parents and caregivers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.