Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39911722›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology2025

Impact of the Number of Administered Systemic Treatment Lines on Local Response to Radiation Therapy for Multiple Myeloma.

Andrea Emanuele Guerini, Eneida Mataj, Paolo Borghetti, Luca Triggiani, Ludovica Pegurri, Stefania Nici, Stefano Riga, Alessandra Tucci, Angelo Belotti, Marco Lorenzo Bonù and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Andrea Emanuele GueriniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy.
Eneida MatajDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy.
Paolo BorghettiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy.
Luca TriggianiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy.
Ludovica PegurriDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy.
Stefania NiciMedical Physics Department, ASST Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy.
Stefano RigaMedical Physics Department, ASST Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy.
Alessandra TucciDepartment of Haematology, ASST Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy.
Angelo BelottiDepartment of Haematology, ASST Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy.
Marco Lorenzo BonùDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy.
Giorgio FacherisDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy.
Stefano Maria MagriniDipartimento di Specialità Medico-Chirurgiche, Centro per lo Studio della Radioterapia guidata dalle Immagini e dai Biomarkers (BIO-RT), Scienze Radiologiche e Sanità Pubblica, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Luigi SpiazziDepartment of Haematology, ASST Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy.
Michela BuglioneDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Multiple myeloma (MM) tends to develop resistance to systemic therapy through multiple mechanisms that might as well induce radioresistance, as suggested by preclinical studies. The aim of the present analysis was to elucidate whether the number of systemic treatment lines received prior to radiation therapy (RT) might confer radioresistance and influence local response. Methods and Materials: This single-center retrospective study enrolled patients who received RT for MM at our institution between January 1, 2005, and January 31, 2023. Information regarding RT, systemic therapy, and characteristics of the patients and disease were retrieved from medical records. The primary outcome for this analysis was radiologic local response at 6 months after RT, according to RECIST 1.1 (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) or PERCIST 1.0 (Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumors) criteria. The secondary outcome was toxicity reported during the RT course. Results: Data from 665 MM lesions from 366 patients were analyzed. Data regarding local response at 6 months were available for 217 lesions, reporting 29 complete responses (13.4%), 141 partial responses (65%), 42 stable diseases (19.4%), and only 5 disease progressions (2.3%). The number of previous systemic treatment lines had no impact on radiologic response at 6 months ( Conclusions: In this large retrospective cohort of MM patients, the number of systemic treatment lines administered before RT had no impact on the local response, confuting concerns of cross-resistance raised by multiple preclinical studies. Disease control after RT was optimal, and instances of severe toxicities during treatment were rare.

Identifiers

PMID39911722
PMCPMC11795776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.