Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39911709›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2024

Effects of different microplastics on the physicochemical properties and microbial diversity of rice rhizosphere soil.

Sheng Lai, Cunzhong Fan, Ping Yang, Yuanyuan Fang, Lanting Zhang, Minfei Jian, Guofei Dai, Jutao Liu, Huilin Yang, Liqin Shen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Effects ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  8. Responses of soil biochemical properties andFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sheng LaiJiangxi Academy of Water Science and Engineering, Nanchang, China.
Cunzhong FanCollege of Life Science, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang, China.
Ping YangJiangxi Academy of Water Science and Engineering, Nanchang, China.
Yuanyuan FangJiangxi Academy of Water Science and Engineering, Nanchang, China.
Lanting ZhangJiangxi Academy of Water Science and Engineering, Nanchang, China.
Minfei JianCollege of Life Science, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang, China.
Guofei DaiJiangxi Academy of Water Science and Engineering, Nanchang, China.
Jutao LiuJiangxi Academy of Water Science and Engineering, Nanchang, China.
Huilin YangCollege of Life Science, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang, China.
Liqin ShenJiangxi Academy of Water Science and Engineering, Nanchang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biodegradable plastics, as alternatives to conventional waste plastics, are increasingly applied across various fields. However, the ecological risks associated with the widespread use of biodegradable plastics remain unclear. Additionally, biodegradable plastics tend to age in the environment, leading to changes in their physicochemical properties. The ecological risks brought by the aging of microplastics have also been scarcely studied. In this study, we selected conventional microplastics (PE-MPs), biodegradable microplastics (PLA-MPs), and aged biodegradable microplastics (aging-PLA-MPs) to explore their effects on the rhizosphere soil environment of rice. The results showed that microplastics reduced the soil N and P content, with PE slightly increasing the DOC content, while PLA and aging-PLA significantly increased DOC by 21.13 and 24.04%, respectively. Microplastics also decreased soil enzyme activity, with aging-PLA having a somewhat stimulatory effect on enzyme activity compared to PLA. Furthermore, microplastics reduced the soil bacterial diversity index and altered the community structure of dominant bacterial species, with DOC content and FDA hydrolase being the main factors influencing the soil bacterial community. Bacteria were most sensitive to PLA, and the stability of the bacterial microbial network structure decreased, although aging reduced the negative impact of PLA on the bacterial community. This study contributes to our understanding of the ecological risks posed by biodegradable plastics and their aging processes on the environment.

Indexed as

agingbiodegradabilitymicroorganismsmicroplasticsphysicochemical propertiesrhizosphere

Identifiers

PMID39911709
PMCPMC11796422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.