ArticleNeuro-oncology advances
Ivosidenib for the treatment of IDH1-mutant glioma, grades 2-4: Tolerability, predictors of response, and outcomes.
Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- IDH-Mutant Diffuse Glioma: From Metabolic Origins to Targeted Therapy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Vorasidenib improves response to subsequent chemoradiation in a genetically engineered mouse model of IDH-mutant glioma.Science translational medicine · 2026Article
- Contemporary practice patterns in IDH-mutant glioma management: a multidisciplinary multi-institutional survey.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- The molecular mechanisms and potential therapeutic implications of the crosstalk between DNA methylation and metabolic reprogramming in thyroid cancer.Cell death discovery · 2026Review
- Ivosidenib treatment in IDH-mutant WHO grade 4 astrocytomas: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2026Article
- Current Pharmacotherapeutic Strategies in Diffuse Gliomas: Focus on Glioblastoma, IDH-Wildtype, and Emerging Targeted Therapies for IDH-Mutant Tumors.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Radiographic Enhancing Progression Without Molecular or Histologic Progression in IDH-Mutant Grade 2 Astrocytoma Treated With an IDH Inhibitor: A Case Report.Case reports in neurological medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Reproductive health considerations for IDH-mutant glioma patients considering IDH inhibitor therapy: A retrospective cohort study.Neuro-oncology practice · 2025Article
- Single center experience of IDH inhibitors in recurrent high-grade gliomas.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Review
- Small-Molecule Drugs in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Review
- Comparative Clinical-Imaging and Histogenetic Analysis Between Astrocytoma IDH-Mutant Grade 4 and Glioblastoma IDH-Wildtype-Is There Really a Worse One?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Leveraging transcriptomic, DNA methylation, and molecular alteration data to optimize the classification of IDH-mutant gliomas for therapy selection.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
33 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDHm) inhibitors represent a novel targeted approach for treating IDHm glioma patients, yet their optimal use in clinical practice outside of clinical trials remains undefined. This study describes the real-world utilization of the mutant IDH1 inhibitor (IDHi), ivosidenib, in patients with IDHm glioma. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed clinical and radiographic data from patients with IDHm glioma treated with ivosidenib monotherapy from 2020 to 2024 at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Massachusetts General Hospital. Results: This cohort included 74 patients with a median age of 39. There were 35 astrocytomas and 39 oligodendrogliomas, with 49, 23, and 2, grade 2, 3, and 4 tumors, respectively. Nineteen patients (26%) experienced an adverse event, although only 1 patient discontinued ivosidenib for adverse events. Median progression-free survival was 31 months and median overall survival was not reached. Seven patients (9%) had partial response, 3 (4%) had minor response, 47 (64%) had stable disease, and 17 (23%) had progressive disease. The presence of enhancing disease at ivosidenib initiation was associated with lower disease control rates (DCR) whereas DCR differences were not detected based on grade (grade 2 vs. 3), tumor histology, or age. Subsequent-line ivosidenib use had lower DCR although this may have been explained by enrichment of patients with enhancing disease. Conclusions: In this large cohort of IDHm glioma patients, ivosidenib was well tolerated. Our results support the use of IDHi therapy in patients with grade 2 or 3 astrocytoma or oligodendroglioma and highlight limited effectiveness in patients with enhancing disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.