ArticleInternet interventions2025
Patient experiences of internet-based enhanced cognitive behavior therapy for eating disorders.
Article in Internet interventions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The self-directed patient in guided internet-delivered CBT: a qualitative study of patient role expectations.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Internet-based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (ICBT) has shown promise in addressing the treatment gap for eating disorders (EDs), with evidence indicating moderate to large effect sizes. However, some individuals experience no improvement or deterioration in their condition, highlighting the need to understand both successful and unsuccessful outcomes. Aim: This study aimed to explore patients' experiences undergoing Internet-based guided self-help treatment based on Enhanced Cognitive Behavior Therapy (ICBT-E) for bulimia nervosa (BN) and binge eating disorder (BED), focusing on both those who benefited from the treatment and those who did not. Method: Sixteen participants with a diagnosis of full or subthreshold BN or BED, including eight non-responders and eight responders, participated in a semi-structured telephone interview. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Results: Responders strongly identified with the content, facilitating treatment implementation, while non-responders found the content less relevant to their symptoms. The treatment was overall perceived as time-consuming, but non-responders found it overwhelming and struggled with motivation and self-discipline. Non-responders preferred synchronous communication, while responders valued the flexibility of asynchronous contact. Overall, participants acknowledged the importance of ICBT-E, though non-responders felt it was not tailored to their specific needs. Conclusions: The study highlighted considerations for designing and implementing ICBT-E, including tailoring content to diverse patient symptoms, managing time demands, and considering motivation and self-discipline when assigning this treatment. While ICBT-E shows promise for the widespread dissemination of treatment for EDs, ongoing evaluation of progress during treatment and timely referral to alternative interventions for non-responders are crucial for optimizing outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.