Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39911688›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025

Which is more effective in thawing frozen rooster sperm: varying temperature or duration?

Mustafa Yiğit Nizam, Murat Selçuk, Burcu Esin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mustafa Yiğit NizamDepartment of Reproduction and Artificial Insemination, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir, Türkiye.
Murat SelçukDepartment of Reproduction and Artificial Insemination, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Türkiye.
Burcu EsinDepartment of Reproduction and Artificial Insemination, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Cryopreservation of poultry sperm is crucial for preserving genetic diversity and protecting endangered breeds. Rooster sperm is highly sensitive to cryopreservation due to its high polyunsaturated fatty acid content, making it prone to damage during freezing and thawing. This study evaluated the effects of thawing temperatures and storage conditions on sperm quality, including motility, morphology, and viability. Methods: Frozen rooster semen samples were thawed at 37°C for 30 seconds, 60°C for 5 seconds, or 72°C for 5 seconds and stored at 4°C for up to 48 hours. Sperm quality parameters, including motility, kinematic characteristics, abnormal morphology, and viability, were assessed at 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, and 48 hours using a Computer-Assisted Semen Analyzer (CASA). Results: Post-thaw motility varied significantly between thawing temperatures at 24 and 48 hours ( Discussion: Thawing at 37°C and storing at 4°C for up to 24 hours optimizes sperm motility and viability, minimizing cryodamage and ensuring functional preservation. This approach is effective for short-term storage and crucial for sustaining genetic diversity and fertility in poultry breeding programs.

Indexed as

cryopreservationdry thawingpost-thawroostersperm

Identifiers

PMID39911688
PMCPMC11794512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.