ArticleEthiopian journal of health sciences2024
Agreement Between a Subjective Single-Item Socioeconomic Status and Wealth Index in the Addis Health and Demographic Surveillance System (Addis-HDSS), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Article in Ethiopian journal of health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Measuring household economic status is crucial, as it is a key determinant of health. In low-income settings, no single measure of economic status is universally accepted. This study aims to assess the agreement between a single-item tool for measuring socioeconomic status (SES) and the wealth index. Methods: The Addis Health and Demographic Surveillance System (Addis-HDSS), based in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, collects data on various socioeconomic indicators, including income, expenditure, and asset ownership. In this study, a single question, "Does your family's income cover basic needs?" was used as a proxy for SES. The percent agreement with the wealth index was calculated, and significance was assessed using the Pearson chi-square test. Scale reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha (α). Results: Data from 30,533 households showed strong agreement (α = 0.925) between self-reported income adequacy and wealth for both lower and higher wealth groups. The highest agreement was found between the lowest wealth index and "very low" income adequacy (93.84%) and between the highest wealth index and "high" income adequacy (89.47%) (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The single-item SES measure showed good agreement with the wealth index in an urban setting. This simple tool can effectively identify vulnerable populations for targeted health interventions. Further research is needed to assess its applicability in other contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.