ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2024
Severity of diastolic dysfunction predicts myocardial infarction.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association between left ventricle diastolic dysfunction and circadian blood pressure pattern in arterial hypertension.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Diastolic dysfunction (DD) is known to be a predictor of mortality. However, the impact of DD on the risk for myocardial infarction (MI) is not well defined. We sought to examine whether DD is an independent predictor of risk of MI in patients with a preserved ejection fraction. Methods: This was an observational study of consecutive patients who underwent an echocardiogram that showed normal systolic function and had ≥ 3 months of follow-up. DD was graded using the contemporaneous guidelines at the time of the echocardiogram. Subsequent MI was determined by an inpatient encounter with a primary diagnosis of MI. Results: 129,476 patients were included (mean age 56 years; 58 % women). DD was present in 17.6 % of patients (13.6 % Grade I, 3.6 % Grade II, 0.4 % Grade III). Patients with DD were more likely to be older and have cardiovascular comorbidities. Survival free from MI was significantly lower as DD severity increased. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling demonstrated that DD was an independent predictor of MI (hazard ratios [CI]: Grade I: 1.48 [1.33-1.66]; Grade II: 1.84 [1.57-2.16]; Grade III: 2.90 [1.98-4.25]). Conclusion: Our data demonstrate that the risk of MI is significantly increased in the presence of DD, with higher risk at higher grades of DD. The increased risk associated with grade III DD is comparable to that from a prior history of percutaneous coronary intervention. These findings suggest that the severity of DD may be a useful tool in stratifying patients for risk of MI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.