ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Robot-assisted Pelvic Reconstruction Using Rectus Abdominis Flap: Efficiency Evaluation of Adding a Third Surgeon.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Complex and Recurrent Hiatal Hernia Repair Using a Pedicled Rectus Abdominis Flap: Surgical Technique and Case Series.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The open rectus abdominis flap has long been a versatile workhorse in pelvic reconstruction. In an effort to reduce morbidity of open approach, robotic harvest techniques have been developed. Our institution previously published a retrospective study that compared outcomes between the robotic and open approaches between 2014 and 2019. Since then, our technique has evolved to include the addition of a general surgeon for simultaneous harvest site closure and flap insetting. Methods: This is an institutional review board-approved single-institution retrospective review of patients who underwent robotic rectus harvest using Da Vinci surgical system for perineal reconstruction between 2018 and June 2023. The dataset was stratified into patients who underwent 3-surgeon reconstruction versus 2-surgeon reconstruction. Data collected included demographics, risk factors, perioperative information, and postoperative outcomes. Results: In total, 21 patients underwent robotic rectus repair from 2018 to 2023 with operations occurring at 3 different hospitals. Of those patients 7 were excluded, resulting in 14 patients included for evaluation: 8 patients who underwent 3-surgeon operation and 6 in the 2-surgeon cohort. We found no difference in total operative time (508.1 versus 506.8, Conclusions: Although this is a small study, the data suggest that plastic surgeons trained in robotic techniques are well-equipped to perform the harvest, mesh repair, and flap inset without the addition of a general surgeon.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.