ArticleBMJ neurology open2025
First validation of the novel Freiburg Neurointerventional Score purposely designed for use by emergency medical dispatchers for detecting anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion in patients with suspected stroke.
Article in BMJ neurology open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractBackground: Detecting an anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion (aLVO) as a cause of stroke during emergency calls could optimise dispatch, particularly in rural areas. Numerous stroke severity scales assessing motor and cortical signs have been designed for direct patient contact; however, none have been purposely designed for emergency calls. This study aimed to prospectively validate the novel Freiburg Neurointerventional Score (FRENS) in patients presenting with a suspected acute stroke to detect aLVO. Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years with suspected acute stroke brought directly to our tertiary hospital by paramedics, between May 2021 and 2022, were included in this study. We used the FRENS and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) to analyse the FRENS convergent validity. We evaluated and compared the predictive ability and test characteristics of the FRENS and five established NIHSS-based stroke severity scales for the detection of an aLVO stroke. We analysed the number of steps required for the completion of the FRENS algorithm. Results: Among the 1042 analysed patients, the FRENS items showed high convergent validity with corresponding NIHSS items. A positive FRENS was statistically significantly correlated with an aLVO stroke. The FRENS had the highest sensitivity and negative predictive values for an aLVO stroke and the highest sensitivity value for M2 occlusions. The FRENS provided results after two and all four steps, in 71% and <3% of cases, respectively. Conclusions: The FRENS enabled the rapid, sensitive detection of an aLVO in patients with suspected acute stroke. Designed for use in emergency calls, the FRENS requires translation and validation in a prehospital setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.