ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2024
Ferula (
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to examine the effects of Ferula root powder (FRP) on performance, egg quality, egg oxidant/antioxidant levels, some serum hormone/biochemical parameters, and physical properties of the oviduct in laying hens. A total of 72 (8 replicates, 3 hens/subgroup) laying hens (Nick Brown, 30 weeks) were divided into three groups (FRP-0, FRP-1, FRP-2). During the 9-week trial, FRP-0 (control) was fed with a basal diet (16.88% crude protein, 2,725 kcal/kg metabolizable energy). FRP-1 and FRP-2 groups, however, were fed a diet supplemented with 1 g/kg and 2 g/kg FRP, respectively. The results showed that laying performance, serum hormone (estradiol, progesterone) levels, and some internal organ weights were not affected by FRP supplementation. In comparison to the control group, higher yolk height and yolk index were found in the FRP-added groups. The albumen pH was found to have decreased in FRP-2 group. DPPH radical scavenging activity increased in egg yolk. TBARs value decreased in FRP-1 and FRP-2 groups. Serum triglyceride and cholesterol levels decreased in group FRP-2. Moreover, a higher uterus length was found in the FRP-supplemented group. Given the results achieved, it was determined that FRP does not have a significant estrogenic effect. However, FRP can be utilized to prevent lipid oxidation and for its hypocholesterolemic effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.