ArticleJournal of emergencies, trauma, and shock
Identification of Predictive Factors for Massive Transfusion Activation in Trauma Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Article in Journal of emergencies, trauma, and shock. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between time to transfusion and outcomes in patients with traumatic haemorrhagic shock: an analysis of a nationwide trauma registry in Japan.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Article
- Limits of Transfusion Burden as a Predictor of Mortality in Severely Injured Trauma Patients.Open access emergency medicine : OAEM · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Acute blood loss and uncontrolled hemorrhage in trauma require quick identification and action to restore circulating volume and save the patient. These patients have the opportunity to receive massive transfusion (MT) to reduce mortality rates and avoid overtransfusion using a suitable ratio of blood components. This study aims to systematically review and analyze the predictive factors for the activation of MT protocol (MTP) in trauma patients, which is critical for improving clinical decision-making and patient outcomes. Methods: PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane, and other sources were searched for articles from 2007 to 2020. Conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement, this systematic review included original studies published in English, involving trauma patients aged 15 years or older who received MTP. The risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the RoB in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions-I and RoB 2 tools, and statistical analysis was performed, focusing on the homogeneity of effect sizes across trials. Results: The articles search identified a total of 424 studies. Nine studies met all inclusion criteria. The most common predictors were age, sex, systolic blood pressure (SBP), heart rate (HR), hemoglobin (Hb) levels, international normalized ratio (INR), base excess (BE), and lactate levels. The analysis showed that parameters such as SBP, HR, Hb, INR, BE, and lactate were significantly associated with the activation of MTP. However, age and sex were not significant predictors. The survival rate was notably lower in the MTP group compared to the non-MTP group. There was no evidence of publication bias. Conclusion: Several physiological parameters: low SBP, elevated HR, reduced Hb, increased INR, diminished BE, and elevated lactate are significantly correlated with an increased likelihood of necessitating MTP in trauma patients. Among those who received MTP, the survival rate was lower compared to the non-MTP group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.