ArticleHeliyon2025
Report of joint hypermobility in malignant hyperthermia susceptible patients: Observational study with a case-control descriptive design.
Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association between joint dislocation and malignant hyperthermia.Anaesthesia reportsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hypermobility is the capacity to perform joint movements in amplitudes greater than normal. Hypermobility is present in nearly 100 % of congenital myopathy central core disease (CCD) patients but is sporadically described in the allelic disease malignant hyperthermia (MH). Our objective was to investigate the frequency/characteristics of hypermobility in MH susceptible patients as compared to a control group, aiming the identification of correlations between hypermobility and demographic/clinical findings in MH patients. Methods: We recruited 26 MH patients (MH history, positive Results: Bulbena score indicative of hypermobility was significantly more frequent in MH than in the control group (50 % versus 13 %, relative risk 2.06 (95%CI 1.27-3.35), chi-square test, p < .01). Goniometric assessment revealed significantly greater range of motion of mostly proximal movements in MH versus control groups. In the MH group, there was no correlation of the Bulbena score with age, sex, clinical complaints of myalgia/cramps, CK levels, IVCT result, or degree of contracture after caffeine or halothane. Conclusions: It is possible that predominantly proximal hypermobility is part of a clinical spectrum associated with
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.