Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39911414›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2025

Wild Bee Assemblages and Pollination Networks of Managed Emergent Wetlands in Central New York, USA.

Molly M Jacobson, Michael L Schummer, Melissa K Fierke, Paige R Chesshire, Donald J Leopold

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Molly M JacobsonDepartment of Environmental Biology SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry Syracuse New York USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6638-9712
Michael L SchummerDepartment of Environmental Biology SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry Syracuse New York USA.
Melissa K FierkeDepartment of Environmental Biology SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry Syracuse New York USA.
Paige R ChesshireDepartment of Environmental Biology SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry Syracuse New York USA.
Donald J LeopoldDepartment of Environmental Biology SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry Syracuse New York USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To effectively protect wild bee pollinators and the services they provide, it is critical to gather data on their distributions, life histories, and interactions with plants among a diversity of habitat types. Wetlands are underrepresented in bee surveys, despite having a great diversity of flowering plants and known importance to hundreds of species of wildlife. In this 2-year survey of a restored wetland complex in Central New York, over 9000 bees were collected, representing ≥ 109 species in 25 genera. We recorded 337 unique plant-pollinator associations, including those previously undocumented for the wetland obligate masked bee,

Indexed as

New Yorkplant–pollinator networkswetland managementwetland restorationwild bees

Identifiers

PMID39911414
PMCPMC11795061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.