ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2025
Association of hepatitis B virus DNA levels with efficacy and safety and the impact of antiviral therapy on prognosis in liver cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Emerging antiviral drugs and immunotherapy for chronic hepatitis B and associated liver disease.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The current evidence regarding the relationship between baseline hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels and survival outcomes in liver cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remains inconsistent. Therefore, this review was intended to explore the impact of the baseline HBV-DNA level on the efficacy and safety of ICIs in patients with liver cancer. Methods: Relevant studies were identified through a comprehensive search in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science up to August 1, 2024. The outcomes were hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), as well as odds ratios (ORs) for objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and HBV reactivation (HBVr). Subgroup analysis, publication bias, and sensitivity analysis were conducted with STATA 14.0. Results: This meta-analysis comprised 17 articles involving a total of 2,130 patients. The pooled results demonstrated that high HBV DNA was associated with a worse OS (HR = 1.48 95% CI 1.11-1.96). Further subgroup analysis showed that there was no difference in OS between the high HBV DNA group and low HBV DNA group when all patients received antiviral treatment. No associations between baseline HBV DNA and PFS (HR = 1.08, 95% CI 0.90-1.29), ORR (OR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.65-1.28), or DCR (OR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.58-1.20) were observed. The risk of HBVr in the high HBV DNA group was lower than that in the low HBV DNA group (OR = 0.30, 95% CI 0.15-0.58), especially among patients who received antiviral therapy (OR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.18-0.98). Conclusion: High HBV DNA was associated with worse OS, but not with PFS, ORR, or DCR in liver cancer patients receiving ICIs. When patients were simultaneously treated with antiviral treatment, elevated HBV DNA level had no unfavorable impact on the efficacy of ICIs. Furthermore, the risk of HBVr in the high HBV-DNA group was lower than that in the low HBV DNA group. More prospective studies with larger sample sizes are essential to confirm the results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.