ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025
Development and validation of an explainable machine learning model for mortality prediction among patients with infected pancreatic necrosis.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- An interpretable machine learning model for predicting febrile seizures following enterovirus infection in children.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Closed-Loop Neuromodulation for Brain Fatigue: From Real-Time Biomarkers to Adaptive Intervention.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Machine Learning for Risk Stratification in Acute Pancreatitis: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Development and External Validation of an Explainable Machine-Learning Model for Predicting Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Older Adults Undergoing Degenerative Spine Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Systematic evaluation of machine learning models for clinical risk prediction on real-world hospital datasets.iScience · 2026Article
- Management and Prediction of Acute Pancreatitis Severity Using AI: A Surgical Perspective.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Early Prediction and Prognostic Value of Chronic Critical Illness and Persistent Inflammation, Immunosuppression, and Catabolism Syndrome in Patients with Severe Acute Pancreatitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Benchmarking Feature Selection Methods and Prediction Models for Flowering Time Prediction in Maize.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Article
- An interpretable machine learning framework for classifying human and machine translations across genres.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Association between peak D-dimer levels within 24 hours of admission and the risk of infected pancreatic necrosis in hyperlipidemic acute pancreatitis: a retrospective analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of an Explainable Machine Learning Model for Prediction of Massive Transfusion in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Article
- Development and interpretable machine learning models for classification of pancreatic pseudocyst risk in acute pancreatitis.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Identification of Misdiagnosis Factors in Allergic Bronchopulmonary Mycosis Using Explainable Machine Learning.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2026Article
- Article
- An interpretable machine learning model for predicting sleep disturbances in adolescents with mood disorders: the key role of psychological factors.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- Integrating Feature Selection, Machine Learning, and SHAP Explainability to Predict Severe Acute Pancreatitis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The incremental value of unstructured data via natural language processing in machine learning-based COVID-19 mortality prediction: a comparative study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN) represents a severe complication of acute pancreatitis, commonly linked with mortality rates ranging from 15% to 35%. However, the present mortality prediction tools for IPN are limited and lack sufficient sensitivity and specificity. This study aims to develop and validate an explainable machine learning (ML) model for death prediction among patients with IPN. Methods: We performed a prospective cohort study of 344 patients with IPN consecutively enrolled from a large Chinese tertiary hospital from January 2011 to January 2023. Ten ML models were developed to predict 90-day mortality in these patients. A benchmarking test, involving nested resampling, automatic hyperparameter tuning and random search techniques, was conducted to select the ML model. Sequential forward selection method was employed to select the optimal feature subset from 31 candidate subsets to simplify the model and maximize predictive performance. The final model was internally validated with the 1000 bootstrap method and externally validated using an independent cohort of 132 patients with IPN retrospectively collected from another Chinese tertiary hospital from January 2018 to January 2023. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was employed to interpret the model in terms of features importance and features effect. The final model constructed with optimal feature subset was deployed as an interactive web-based Shiny app. Findings: Random survival forest (RSF) model showed the best predictive performance than other 9 ML models (internal validation, C-index = 0.863 [95% CI: 0.854-0.875]; external validation, C-index = 0.857 [95% CI: 0.850-0.865]). Multiple organ failure, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Examination II (APACHE II) score ≥20, duration of organ failure ≥21 days, bloodstream infection, time from onset to first intervention <30 days, Bedside Index of Severity in Acute Pancreatitis score ≥3, critical acute pancreatitis, age ≥ 50 years, and hemorrhage were 9 most important features associated with mortality. Furthermore, SHAP algorithm revealed insightful nonlinear interactive associations between important predictors and mortality, identifying 9 features pairs with high interaction SHAP value and clinical significance. Two interactive web-based Shiny apps were developed to enhance clinical practicability: https://rsfmodels.shinyapps.io/IPN_app/ for cases where the APACHE II score was available and https://rsfmodels.shinyapps.io/IPNeasy/ for cases where it was not. Interpretation: An explainable ML model for death prediction among IPN patients was feasible and effective, suggesting its superior potential in guiding clinical management and improving patient outcomes. Two publicly accessible web tools generated for the optimized model facilitated its utility in clinical settings. Funding: The Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (2023JJ30885), Postdoctoral Fellowship Program of CPSF (GZB20230872), The Youth Science Foundation of Xiangya Hospital (2023Q13), The Project Program of National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders of Xiangya Hospital (2021LNJJ19).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.