Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39911245›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025

Development and validation of an explainable machine learning model for mortality prediction among patients with infected pancreatic necrosis.

Caihong Ning, Hui Ouyang, Jie Xiao, Di Wu, Zefang Sun, Baiqi Liu, Dingcheng Shen, Xiaoyue Hong, Chiayan Lin, Jiarong Li and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Caihong NingDepartment of General Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province 410008, China.
Hui OuyangDepartment of General Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province 410008, China.
Jie XiaoDepartment of Emergency, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province 410008, China.
Di WuDepartment of Emergency, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province 410008, China.
Zefang SunDepartment of General Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province 410008, China.
Baiqi LiuDepartment of General Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province 410008, China.
Dingcheng ShenDepartment of General Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province 410008, China.
Xiaoyue HongDepartment of General Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province 410008, China.
Chiayan LinDepartment of General Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province 410008, China.
Jiarong LiDepartment of General Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province 410008, China.
Lu ChenDepartment of General Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province 410008, China.
Shuai ZhuDepartment of General Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province 410008, China.
Xinying LiDepartment of General Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province 410008, China.
Fada XiaDepartment of General Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province 410008, China.
Gengwen HuangDepartment of General Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province 410008, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN) represents a severe complication of acute pancreatitis, commonly linked with mortality rates ranging from 15% to 35%. However, the present mortality prediction tools for IPN are limited and lack sufficient sensitivity and specificity. This study aims to develop and validate an explainable machine learning (ML) model for death prediction among patients with IPN. Methods: We performed a prospective cohort study of 344 patients with IPN consecutively enrolled from a large Chinese tertiary hospital from January 2011 to January 2023. Ten ML models were developed to predict 90-day mortality in these patients. A benchmarking test, involving nested resampling, automatic hyperparameter tuning and random search techniques, was conducted to select the ML model. Sequential forward selection method was employed to select the optimal feature subset from 31 candidate subsets to simplify the model and maximize predictive performance. The final model was internally validated with the 1000 bootstrap method and externally validated using an independent cohort of 132 patients with IPN retrospectively collected from another Chinese tertiary hospital from January 2018 to January 2023. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was employed to interpret the model in terms of features importance and features effect. The final model constructed with optimal feature subset was deployed as an interactive web-based Shiny app. Findings: Random survival forest (RSF) model showed the best predictive performance than other 9 ML models (internal validation, C-index = 0.863 [95% CI: 0.854-0.875]; external validation, C-index = 0.857 [95% CI: 0.850-0.865]). Multiple organ failure, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Examination II (APACHE II) score ≥20, duration of organ failure ≥21 days, bloodstream infection, time from onset to first intervention <30 days, Bedside Index of Severity in Acute Pancreatitis score ≥3, critical acute pancreatitis, age ≥ 50 years, and hemorrhage were 9 most important features associated with mortality. Furthermore, SHAP algorithm revealed insightful nonlinear interactive associations between important predictors and mortality, identifying 9 features pairs with high interaction SHAP value and clinical significance. Two interactive web-based Shiny apps were developed to enhance clinical practicability: https://rsfmodels.shinyapps.io/IPN_app/ for cases where the APACHE II score was available and https://rsfmodels.shinyapps.io/IPNeasy/ for cases where it was not. Interpretation: An explainable ML model for death prediction among IPN patients was feasible and effective, suggesting its superior potential in guiding clinical management and improving patient outcomes. Two publicly accessible web tools generated for the optimized model facilitated its utility in clinical settings. Funding: The Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (2023JJ30885), Postdoctoral Fellowship Program of CPSF (GZB20230872), The Youth Science Foundation of Xiangya Hospital (2023Q13), The Project Program of National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders of Xiangya Hospital (2021LNJJ19).

Indexed as

Infected pancreatic necrosisMachine learningPrediction modelSHapley additive exPlanationsShiny app

Identifiers

PMID39911245
PMCPMC11795559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.