ArticleHIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.)2025
Sexual Practices and HIV Prevention Strategies Used by Female Sex Workers in Lagos, Nigeria: An Assessment of the Willingness to Use a Microbicide.
Article in HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Barriers and Facilitators of Oral PrEP Uptake Against HIV Among Selected Priority Populations: A Global Perspective.Current HIV/AIDS reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Female sex workers have a 13-fold higher risk of acquiring HIV than women who do not engage in sex work. The willingness and acceptability of a product is crucial for the development of microbicides. This research aimed to evaluate the sexual practices, existing HIV prevention methods, and willingness to use a microbicide for HIV prevention among female sex workers in Nigeria. We also explored factors that might influence their willingness to use a new microbicide product. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among female sex workers recruited from brothels within Lagos-Nigeria, in which participants were selected via purposive sampling over a period of five-months. An interviewer-administered, semi-structured questionnaire was used to obtain information. Descriptive statistics were used to present the results, and a multiple logistic regression model was used to determine the factors associated with willingness to use a microbicide. Results: A total of 461 female participants with a mean-age of 29.63 ± 8.8 years were included in the analysis of which 34.3% had >4 sexual partners, 91.8% used condoms, 53.6% engaged in anal sex, 69.6% had experienced condom rupture, and 31% would "accept unprotected sex" if the male partner refuses to use a condom. Approximately 43% had received PEP, of which only 15% completed the one-month PEP-regimen. On the other hand, 64.6% had taken PrEP medications, of which 28% admitted skipping doses. Although 41% were concerned about male partner acceptance, a total of 95% will be willing to use a microbicide. The number of sexual partners ([aOR] 1.555; 95% Cl 1.035-2.335), use of condoms ([aOR] 4.701; 95% Cl 1.418-15.584), and condom rupture experience ([aOR] 2.550; 95% Cl 1.817-7.959) were associated with greater odds of willingness to use an HIV microbicide. Conclusion: There is a high level of willingness to use a future microbicide among the female commercial sex workers in this study. In addition, majority of the participants will prefer a microbicide product that is female controlled, affordable, and provided as an over-the-counter medication. This cohort of women engage in high-risk sexual practices and play a significant role in HIV prevention efforts. Therefore, their product preferences and concerns should be considered in microbicide development to enhance the acceptability, adherence, and efficacy of future microbicides.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.