Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39911159›Full record

ArticleBioscience2025

Telecoupling cannot be ignored for the forest-based carbon market.

Brooke A Williams, Jean-Paul Metzger, Frankie Cho, Anya Phelan, Sofía López-Cubillos, Lily K Bentley, Bojie Fu, Yangjian Zhang, Yanxu Liu, Justin Johnson and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bioscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Brooke A WilliamsSchool of Biology and Environmental Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0692-7507
Jean-Paul MetzgerDepartment of Ecology, Institute of Biosciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0087-5240
Frankie ChoSchool of Biology and Environmental Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1369-4980
Anya PhelanCentre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4341-9912
Sofía López-CubillosCentre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9899-9099
Lily K BentleyCentre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0365-6385
Bojie FuState Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yangjian ZhangKey Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9282-0019
Yanxu LiuState Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3571-1932
Justin JohnsonDepartment of Applied Economics, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States.
Jonathan R RhodesSchool of Biology and Environmental Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6746-7412

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Telecoupling interactions between social-ecological systems across large, often global distances drive negative impacts from the forest-based carbon market. However, these negative impacts have been underreported and, therefore, have likely been vastly underestimated. We identify how these unintended negative impacts may occur and provide recommendations for the forest-based carbon market to better account for externalities by prioritizing positive social impact, expanding comprehensive ecological outcomes, and improving the transparency of investments. We call for a carbon market that is designed to account for its global interconnectedness.

Indexed as

carbon creditscarbon offsetclimate changeconservationrestoration

Identifiers

PMID39911159
PMCPMC11791526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.