Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39911156›Full record

ReviewBioscience2025

Advancing terrestrial ecology by improving cross-temporal research and collaboration.

Lauren Azevedo-Schmidt, Madeleine Landrum, Meghan M Spoth, Nikhil R Brocchini, Kit M Hamley, Alessandro Mereghetti, Andrea J Tirrell, Jacquelyn L Gill

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lauren Azevedo-SchmidtDepartment of Entomology and Nematology, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5919-1612
Madeleine LandrumClimate Change Institute, University of Maine, Orono, Maine, United States.
Meghan M SpothClimate Change Institute, University of Maine, Orono, Maine, United States.
Nikhil R BrocchiniClimate Change Institute, University of Maine, Orono, Maine, United States.
Kit M HamleyClimate Change Institute, University of Maine, Orono, Maine, United States.
Alessandro MereghettiClimate Change Institute, University of Maine, Orono, Maine, United States.
Andrea J TirrellClimate Change Institute, University of Maine, Orono, Maine, United States.
Jacquelyn L GillClimate Change Institute, University of Maine, Orono, Maine, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ecology spans spatial and temporal scales and is inclusive of the history of life on Earth. However, research that occurs at millennial timescales or longer has historically been defined as paleoecology and has not always been well integrated with modern (neo-) ecology. This bifurcation has been previously highlighted, with calls for improved engagement among the subdisciplines, but their priority research areas have not been directly compared. To characterize the research agendas for terrestrial ecological research across different temporal scales, we compared two previous studies, Sutherland and colleagues (2013; neoecology) and Seddon and colleagues (2014; paleoecology), that outlined priority research questions. We identified several themes with potential for temporal integration and explored case studies that highlight cross-temporal collaboration. Finally, a path forward is outlined, focusing on education and training, research infrastructure, and collaboration. Our aim is to improve our understanding of biodiversity patterns and processes by promoting an inclusive and integrative approach that treats time as a foundational concept in ecology.

Identifiers

PMID39911156
PMCPMC11791528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.