ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. A2025
Binding Energy Calculations of Anthracene and Rhodamine 6G H-Type Dimers: A Comparative Study of DFT and SMD Methods.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. A, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cavity-modified exciton-exciton annihilation in disordered molecular systems.Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2026Article
- Tuning the Absorption and Emission Characteristics of Laser Dye Rhodamine 6G Using Ionic Liquids.Journal of fluorescence · 2026Article
- In silico evaluation of (benzo)chromeno[3,4-c]pyridine derivative as dual EGFR/HER2 inhibitors for non-small cell lung cancer.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the ever-growing need to study systems of increased size and complexity, modern density functional theory (DFT) methods often encounter problems arising from the growing computational demands. In this work, we have presented a comprehensive DFT validation of the steered molecular dynamics (SMD) approach in estimating the binding energies of aromatic dimers. By performing DFT calculations on optimized and unoptimized anthracene and rhodamine 6G (R6G) dimers using functionals with progressively enhanced exchange-correlation energy description and comparing the obtained results with SMD-predicted values, it was found that SMD predictions are in good agreement with the results obtained from hybrid DFT calculations. The average binding energies for optimized anthracene dimers were found to be 6.46 kcal/mol using DFT at ωB97X-D4/def2-QZVPP and 7.64 ± 1.61 kcal/mol as predicted by the SMD. For the R6G H-type dimer, the binding energies were 17.48 and 19.02 ± 2.22 kcal/mol, respectively. The study also revealed that due to the lack of explicit terms accounting for electron-electron interactions in MD force fields, the proposed method tends to overbind dimers. It is anticipated that the presented method can be applied to more complex dimers, potentially accelerating the calculations of binding energies. Moreover, this study further validates the accuracy of the CHARMM36 FF.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.