Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39910906›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational science2025

Pharmacogenetic Information on Drug Labels of the Italian Agency of Medicines (AIFA): Actionability and Comparison Across Other Regulatory Agencies.

Antonino Moschella, Soumaya Mourou, Samantha Perfler, Enrico Zoroddu, Daiana Bezzini, Dorian Soru, Claudia Trignano, Monica Miozzo, Alessio Squassina, Erika Cecchin and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Antonino MoschellaUnit of Medical Genetics, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli, Reggio Calabria, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0437-9471
Soumaya MourouDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.ORCID 0009-0008-0940-7671
Samantha PerflerExperimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, Italy.ORCID 0009-0008-0319-3844
Enrico ZorodduDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.ORCID 0009-0009-1711-3267
Daiana BezziniDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2722-7892
Dorian SoruIndependent Consultant, Sardinia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4378-6328
Claudia TrignanoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8846-0700
Monica MiozzoMedical Genetics Unit, Department of Health Sciences, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Università Degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6523-4575
Alessio SquassinaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Section of Neuroscience and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7415-7607
Erika CecchinExperimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7517-7490
Matteo FlorisDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4385-9336

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To plan future steps for the implementation and regulation of pharmacogenetic testing, any issue in the management of pharmacogenetic information by regulatory bodies must be identified. In this paper, an analysis of pharmacogenetic information in the summary of product characteristics (SmCPs) of drugs approved by Italian Drug Agency (AIFA) was conducted. Among 4214 SmCPs of 1063 active ingredients, 53.2% (n = 2240) included pharmacogenetic information in at least one section, most frequently for drugs in the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical category "Antineoplastic and immunomodulatory agents". To contextualize these data in the international scenario, a pharmacogenetic level of actionability, based on AIFA SmCPs, was assigned to 608 drug/gene pairs included in FDA's "Table of Pharmacogenomic Biomarkers in Drug Labels", according to PharmGKB (The Pharmacogenomics Knowledge Base). Approximately 67% of drug/gene pairs were deemed classifiable: Based on SmCPs phrasing, for half of them the genetic testing was cataloged as "required" or "recommended" (mainly tumor somatic variants), whereas 40% as "actionable" (mostly PK/PD-related germline variants). The comparison with other regulatory agencies highlighted a discordance in the assigned pharmacogenetic levels of actionability ranging from 1% to 14%. This discrepancy may also point out the need to rethink the language used in AIFA-approved SmCPs to clarify whether a pharmacogenetic test is necessary or not and for which subjects it has been recommended. For the first time, a detailed evaluation and comparative analysis of the pharmacogenetic information on Italian SmCPs was presented, placing it in an international context and laying the groundwork for rethinking pharmacogenetic indications in AIFA-approved SmCPs.

Indexed as

Drug LabelingGovernment AgenciesPharmacogeneticsPharmacogenomic TestingDrug ApprovalHumansItalyUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationAIFAdrug labelslevel of actionabilitypharmacogenetic testing

Identifiers

PMID39910906
PMCPMC11799589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.