Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39910857›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of biological anthropology2025

Variation in Pubic Symphysis Fusion Across Primates: Implications for Obstetric Adaptation.

Nicole Torres-Tamayo, Laura T Buck, Eishi Hirasaki, Todd C Rae, Lia Betti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of biological anthropology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nicole Torres-TamayoInstitute of Evolutionary Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2504-3886
Laura T BuckResearch Centre for Evolutionary Anthropology and Palaeoecology, School of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1768-9049
Eishi HirasakiCenter for the Evolutionary Origins of Human Behavior, Kyoto University, Inuyama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7849-1936
Todd C RaeSchool of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Lia BettiDepartment of Anthropology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2895-9718

Funding

Division of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences 1623366Division of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences 1720128European Commission AT-TAF-8623European Commission BE-TAF-8273European Commission FR-TAF-8393Great Britain Sasakawa Foundation B130Leakey FoundationLeverhulme Trust RPG-2021-130Primate Research Institute, Kyoto University (Cooperative Research Program)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe unfused human pubic symphysis has been interpreted as an obstetric adaptation to facilitate the passage of a large-brained baby through a relatively small, bipedally adapted pelvis. The degree of fusion of the adult pubic symphysis was evaluated across primate species to gauge whether an open symphysis can be interpreted as an obstetric adaptation in humans and other primates. MATERIALS AND

methodsSymphyseal fusion was assessed in 718 individuals from 67 nonhuman primate species. Variation in fusion in specimens of known ages and sex from four species (Galago moholi, Macaca mulatta, Microcebus murinus, and Pan troglodytes) was further examined, with detailed analyses of pubic changes by age and sex carried out through logistic regressions in macaques.

resultsPubic fusion occurs in most primate species. It is observed earlier in life in males than in females in Ma. mulatta and Pa. troglodytes, only in males in Mi. murinus, and does not occur in Ga. moholi. DISCUSSION: While delayed or absent pubic fusion is more prevalent in female primates, suggesting obstetric adaptation, there is no clear relation with childbirth constraints, as fusion is also observed in species experiencing a tight cephalopelvic fit. Other mechanisms might have evolved to facilitate birth in some species, or nonobstetric selective pressures might be counteracting the obstetric advantages of a flexible symphysis. The preservation of an open symphysis throughout life in humans and some other primates, however, can be best interpreted as convergent evolution due to obstetric selection.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalPrimatesPubic SymphysisAnimalsAnthropology, PhysicalFemaleMaleobstetricobstetrical dilemmapelvisprimatepubic symphysis

Identifiers

PMID39910857
PMCPMC11799747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.