ArticleThe American journal of case reports2025
Button Battery Ingestion in a Neonate: Risk, Management, and Implications.
Article in The American journal of case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although the ingestion of button batteries (BBs) in neonates is exceedingly rare, it poses severe clinical challenges with potentially catastrophic outcomes. The increase in such cases, particularly among toddlers, is largely due to the widespread availability of portable electronic devices. Ingestion of button or disk batteries is notably more dangerous than other foreign bodies, often leading to acute complications such as burns and esophageal perforation. This report details the diagnosis and management of a 21-day-old neonate who presented with a button battery lodged in the esophagus. CASE REPORT We report the case of a 21-day-old neonate who initially presented with 3 days of persistent vomiting. Diagnostic imaging with a chest radiograph revealed a radiopaque foreign body in the esophagus, identified as a button battery. It was suspected that the battery was inadvertently placed in the neonate's mouth by a sibling with an intellectual disability. Initial attempts to remove the battery using 4-, 5-, and 6-mm endoscopes were unsuccessful. However, extraction was eventually accomplished with a 2.5-mm rigid esophagoscope. Following the removal, the neonate developed significant complications, including a tracheoesophageal fistula and esophageal stenosis. Extensive follow-up care led to a full recovery, demonstrating resilience despite the severe initial challenges. CONCLUSIONS This report emphasizes the critical need for swift identification and removal of ingested button batteries. It details the diagnostic and management strategies employed for a neonate, illustrating the urgency and precision required in such cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.