ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024
Steering veridical large language model analyses by correcting and enriching generated database queries: first steps toward ChatGPT bioinformatics.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Responsible Use of Large Language Models in Microbial Genomics and Bioinformatics: A Life-Science Framework for Reliability, Reproducibility, and Risk-Aware Interpretation.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence agents for biological research: a survey.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Prompt injection of OpenAI custom GPTs leaks informatics secrets.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2026Article
- Large language models in emergency and critical care medicine: a comprehensive review of applications, challenges, and future directions.Burns & trauma · 2026Review
- Multiple Confabulations Found in Bioinformatics Tasks Carried Out by Several Free Large Language Models.Current genomics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) leverage factual knowledge from pretraining. Yet this knowledge remains incomplete and sometimes challenging to retrieve-especially in scientific domains not extensively covered in pretraining datasets and where information is still evolving. Here, we focus on genomics and bioinformatics. We confirm and expand upon issues with plain ChatGPT functioning as a bioinformatics assistant. Poor data retrieval and hallucination lead ChatGPT to err, as do incorrect sequence manipulations. To address this, we propose a system basing LLM outputs on up-to-date, authoritative facts and facilitating LLM-guided data analysis. Specifically, we introduce NagGPT, a middleware tool to insert between LLMs and databases, designed to bridge gaps in LLM knowledge and usage of database application programming interfaces. NagGPT proxies LLM-generated database queries, with special handling of incorrect queries. It acts as a gatekeeper between query responses and the LLM prompt, redirecting large responses to files but providing a synthesized snippet and injecting comments to steer the LLM. A companion OpenAI custom GPT, Genomics Fetcher-Analyzer, connects ChatGPT with NagGPT. It steers ChatGPT to generate and run Python code, performing bioinformatics tasks on data dynamically retrieved from a dozen common genomics databases (e.g. NCBI, Ensembl, UniProt, WormBase, and FlyBase). We implement partial mitigations for encountered challenges: detrimental interactions between code generation style and data analysis, confusion between database identifiers, and hallucination of both data and actions taken. Our results identify avenues to augment ChatGPT as a bioinformatics assistant and, more broadly, to improve factual accuracy and instruction following of unmodified LLMs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.