ArticleClinical epigenetics2025
miR-182 promoter hypermethylation predicts the better outcome of AML patients treated with AZA + VEN in a real-world setting.
Article in Clinical epigenetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Liquid Biopsy and Epigenetic Signatures in AML, ALL, and CNS Tumors: Diagnostic and Monitoring Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background5-Azacytidine (AZA) combined with the BCL2 inhibitor Venetoclax (VEN) is the standard treatment for elderly acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients or those who are unfit for intensive chemotherapy (elderly or unfit AML). However, an effective and rapid predictive biomarker to predict treatment outcome remains elusive.
methodsmiR-182 promoter methylation was measured in 94 AZA + VEN-treated elderly or unfit AML patients and 20 normal controls (NCs) samples. To determine whether miR-182 promoter methylation is a predictive marker of clinical outcomes in AZA + VEN-treated AML patients in a real-world setting, we analyzed and compared the complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) rate, overall survival (OS), and leukemia free-survival (LFS) across different methylation groups: miR-182 promoter hypomethylation (median value < 20.21%) and hypermethylation (> 20.21%) in a retrospective study.
resultsThe average methylation frequency was markedly higher in 94 AZA + VEN-treated elderly or unfit AML patients than that in 20 NCs. However, some AML patients (11.7%) still presented low miR-182 promoter methylation (< 10%). The average time to obtain CR/CRi was shorter in AML patients with miR-182 promoter hypermethylation than AML with hypomethylation. Moreover, the median OS and LFS were longer in AML patients with miR-182 promoter hypermethylation than AML with hypomethylation. Finally, the area under the curve (AUC) for 1-year mortality was 0.831, for 2-year was 0.788, and for 3-year was 0.800.
conclusionsAML patients with miR-182 promoter hypermethylation have better outcomes. miR-182 promoter methylation is a predictive biomarker for AZA + VEN-treated AML patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.