Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2025
Effect of an intensive care unit virtual reality intervention on relatives´ mental health distress: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Effects of eHealth interventions on psychological outcomes of post intensive care syndrome-family: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Family Support Strategies During Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingPooled it
- ICU-specific virtual reality for mental health after critical illness: an international three-arm randomized clinical trial.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Trial
- Digital Health Interventions for Family Members of ICU Patients: Current Evidence and Future Directions.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Interventions to improve mental health in caregivers of adult intensive care patients: a systematic review.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- The Effects of Digital Health Interventions for Family Members in Intensive Care Units: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Review
- Nursing Intervention to Support Psychological Recovery Among Intensive Care Patients and Their Families: A Systematic Review with Narrative Synthesis.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- Post-intensive care syndrome: a state-of-the-art review.Singapore medical journal · 2026Review
- Innovative exploration of phantom limb pain treatment based on extended reality technology.World journal of orthopedics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRelatives of intensive care unit (ICU) patients often endure symptoms of post-traumatic stress, anxiety, and depression during and after treatment of a family member's hospitalization. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of ICU-specific virtual reality (ICU-VR) on mental health among relatives, 6 months after patient's ICU discharge.
methodsThis multicenter, randomized controlled trial included relatives of ICU patients who were assigned to receive either standard care or standard care plus ICU-VR, by randomizing the ICU patients. Relatives were assessed up to 6 months after patient discharge from the ICU for post-traumatic stress, anxiety, depression, quality of life, relatives' understanding of ICU care, and appreciation of ICU-VR.
resultsOne hundred relatives of 81 patients and 89 relatives of 80 patients were randomized to the intervention and control groups, respectively. Relatives' median age was 48 years and 53% were female. Compared to the control group, relatives who received ICU-VR did not experience a decrease in post-traumatic stress (23% vs. 18%; p = 0.99), anxiety (22% vs. 30%; p = 0.35), or depression (17% vs. 23%; p = 0.44). There was no significant difference between median mental quality of life (50.2 vs. 52.6; p = 0.51), physical quality of life (56.1 vs. 54.3; p = 0.16), or understanding of ICU care between groups. Patients in the intervention group highly endorsed ICU-VR (90%), favoring it over traditional informational brochures and the majority (82%) stated it improved their understanding of ICU treatment.
conclusionICU-VR did not significantly improve mental health distress symptoms among relatives 6-months after a patient's discharge. Relatives highly endorsed ICU-VR and self-reported that it improved their understanding of ICU treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.