ArticleHereditas2025
Multiple machine learning-based integrations of multi-omics data to identify molecular subtypes and construct a prognostic model for HNSCC.
Article in Hereditas, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Significance of Biomarkers in Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Recurrence Prediction and Treatment Response.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Review
- MicroRNAs as Emerging Therapeutic Targets Modulating the Tumor Microenvironment in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImmunotherapy has introduced new breakthroughs in improving the survival of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients, yet drug resistance remains a critical challenge. Developing personalized treatment strategies based on the molecular heterogeneity of HNSCC is essential to enhance therapeutic efficacy and prognosis.
methodsWe integrated four HNSCC datasets (TCGA-HNSCC, GSE27020, GSE41613, and GSE65858) from TCGA and GEO databases. Using 10 multi-omics consensus clustering algorithms via the MOVICS package, we identified two molecular subtypes (CS1 and CS2) and validated their stability. A machine learning-driven prognostic signature was constructed by combining 101 algorithms, ultimately selecting 30 prognosis-related genes (PRGs) with the Elastic Net model. This signature was further linked to immune infiltration, functional pathways, and therapeutic sensitivity.
resultsCS1 exhibited superior survival outcomes in both TCGA and META-HNSCC cohorts. The PRG-based signature stratified patients into low- and high-risk groups, with the low-risk group showing prolonged survival, enhanced immune cell infiltration (B cells, T cells, monocytes), and activated immune functions (cytolytic activity, T cell co-stimulation). High-risk patients were more sensitive to radiotherapy and chemotherapy (e.g., Cisplatin, 5-Fluorouracil), while low-risk patients responded better to immunotherapy and targeted therapies.
conclusionOur study delineates two molecular subtypes of HNSCC and establishes a robust prognostic model using multi-omics data and machine learning. These findings provide a framework for personalized treatment selection, offering clinical insights to optimize therapeutic strategies for HNSCC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.