Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39910644›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental microbiome2025

Metabolic redundancy and specialisation of novel sulfide-oxidizing Sulfurimonas and Sulfurovum along the brine-seawater interface of the Kebrit Deep.

Rayyan Alamoudi, Alan Barozzi, Grégoire Michoud, Marc W Van Goethem, Charlene Odobel, Yue Chen, Ramona Marasco, Daniele Daffonchio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental microbiome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rayyan Alamoudi *Biological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering Division (BESE), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.
Alan Barozzi *Biological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering Division (BESE), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.
Grégoire MichoudBiological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering Division (BESE), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.
Marc W Van GoethemBiological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering Division (BESE), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.
Charlene OdobelBiological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering Division (BESE), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.
Yue ChenBiological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering Division (BESE), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.
Ramona MarascoBiological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering Division (BESE), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia. ramona.marasco@kaust.edu.sa.
Daniele DaffonchioBiological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering Division (BESE), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia. daniele.daffonchio@kaust.edu.sa.

Funding

King Abdullah University of Science and Technology 5569-OFP2023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMembers of the Campylobacterota phylum are dominant key players in sulfidic environments, where they make up a stable portion of sulfide-oxidizing bacterial communities. Despite the significance of these bacteria in primary production being well recognised in several ecosystems, their genomic and metabolic traits in sulfidic deep hypersaline anoxic basins (DHABs) remain largely unexplored. This knowledge gap not only hampers our understanding of their adaptation and functional role in DHABs but also their ecological interactions with other microorganisms in these unique ecosystems.

resultsMetabolic reconstructions from metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) of sulfide-oxidizing Campylobacterota were conducted at 10 cm spatial resolution within the halocline of the brine-seawater interface (BSI, salinity 91-155 PSU) of the 1466 m deep sulfidic Kebrit Deep in the Red Sea. Fifty-four Campylobacterota MAGs were assembled and dereplicated into three distinct groups, with the highest-quality genome retained as representative. These genomes represent novel sulfide-oxidizing species within the Sulfurimonas and Sulfurovum genera, which differ from those found in mildly saline deep-sea sulfidic pools. They are stratified along the BSI and utilise the reductive tricarboxylic acid cycle to fix carbon dioxide, acting as primary producers. Their energy generation processes include aerobic or anaerobic-nitrate-dependent sulfide oxidation, as well as hydrogen oxidation. In addition to the osmoprotectant pathways commonly observed in Campylobacterota, such as the synthesis and uptake of proline and glutamate, the two Kebrit Deep Sulfurovum species exhibit genomic signatures for ectoine synthesis, further aiding their adaptation to high salinity. This combination of metabolic redundancy and specialisation within the confined spatial boundaries (~1 m) of the BSI is pivotal in governing microbial interactions, including those with sulfate-reducers, heterotrophs, and other primary producers.

conclusionsThese results show how the selective pressures mediated by the sulfidic and hypersaline conditions of Kebrit Deep have resulted in novel, adapted and metabolically redundant Sulfurimonas and Sulfurovum species that contribute to the energy coupling, nutrient turnover and metabolic continuity along the physico-chemical gradient of the BSI.

Indexed as

Brine poolCampylobacterotaDeep hypersaline anoxic basin (DHAB)Metabolic adaptationMetagenomeMicrobial networkingRed SeaSulfidic DHABSulfur metabolism

Identifiers

PMID39910644
PMCPMC11800652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.