Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39910576›Full record

Trial reportReproductive health2025

Acceptability of and experiences with menstrual hygiene cups among adolescent girls and young women aged 15-24 in two communities in Lusaka, Zambia: an exploratory study nested in the Yathu Yathu trial.

Melleh Gondwe, Melvin Simuyaba, Mwelwa Phiri, Chisanga Mwansa, Albertus Schaap, Lucheka Sigande, Kwame Shanaube, Sian Floyd, Sarah Fidler, Helen Ayles and 2 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Reproductive health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Melleh GondweZambart, Ridgeway Campus, Nationalist Road, P.O Box 50697, Lusaka, Zambia. melleh@zambart.org.zm.
Melvin SimuyabaZambart, Ridgeway Campus, Nationalist Road, P.O Box 50697, Lusaka, Zambia.
Mwelwa PhiriZambart, Ridgeway Campus, Nationalist Road, P.O Box 50697, Lusaka, Zambia.
Chisanga MwansaZambart, Ridgeway Campus, Nationalist Road, P.O Box 50697, Lusaka, Zambia.
Albertus SchaapZambart, Ridgeway Campus, Nationalist Road, P.O Box 50697, Lusaka, Zambia.
Lucheka SigandeZambart, Ridgeway Campus, Nationalist Road, P.O Box 50697, Lusaka, Zambia.
Kwame ShanaubeZambart, Ridgeway Campus, Nationalist Road, P.O Box 50697, Lusaka, Zambia.
Sian FloydDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology and International Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Sarah FidlerImperial College and Imperial College NIHR BRC, London, UK.
Helen AylesZambart, Ridgeway Campus, Nationalist Road, P.O Box 50697, Lusaka, Zambia.
Musonda SimwingaZambart, Ridgeway Campus, Nationalist Road, P.O Box 50697, Lusaka, Zambia.
Bernadette HensenClinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMenstrual cups could be a sustainable menstrual material for adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) in sub-Saharan Africa. Yathu Yathu was a cluster-randomized trial of community-based delivery of HIV and sexual and reproductive health services to young people in Lusaka, Zambia. Among services available through the intervention were menstrual products, including menstrual cups. We explored knowledge of menstruation and menstrual products, acceptability, and experiences of using cups among AGYW aged 15-24. We share lessons learned on how to distribute cups through community-based strategies to AGYW in urban communities.

methodsThrough community-based, peer-led spaces (hubs), AGYW could access menstrual products, including pads and menstrual cups. We conducted four focus group discussions, two with AGYW aged 15-19 (n = 9) and 20-21 (n = 8) who had accessed different menstrual products through Yathu Yathu and two with AGYW aged 15-19 (n = 5) and 20-24 (n = 9) who had accessed menstrual cups. Four interviews were conducted with four AGYW (15-19, n = 2; 20-24, n = 2) who had accessed cups, and four with two AGYW who were enrolled in a qualitative cohort. Data were analyzed thematically.

results'Surprise' and 'fear' were initial reactions from most AGYW who saw the cups for the first time at Yathu Yathu hubs. Misconceptions that cups cause cancer and fears that they could get stuck in the vagina, cause sore, vagina enlargement, and loss of virginity were raised by AGYW. The desire to try the cup, use an alternative menstrual product and information gained at the hubs facilitated access. Use of the cup was comfortable, and cups were said to be cost-effective and durable. Advantages over pads included: the absence of odor, easy to maintain, and environmentally friendly: "it is hygienic, and it is even easy to maintain". Challenges included pain, discomfort, and failure to or incorrectly inserting the cup at initial use. When faced with challenges using the cup, AGYW reported going back to the hub for additional information and demonstrations on use.

conclusionDespite concerns, misconceptions and initial challenges, cups were acceptable among AGYW. Free distribution of cups provides an opportunity to address menstrual health challenges among AGYW. However, as a new product, there is need to increase awareness and provide detailed information on use.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeMenstrual Hygiene ProductsMenstruationPatient Acceptance of Health CareAdolescentAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHumansHygieneYoung AdultZambiaAdolescent girls and young womenHubsMenstrual cupMenstrual healthMenstruationPeer support workersSexual and reproductive healthZambia

Identifiers

PMID39910576
PMCPMC11800498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.