ArticleBMC health services research2025
Bridging inequity gaps in healthcare through tailored support: implementation perspectives of the Social Health Bridge-Building Programme.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trends and disparities in chronic ischemic heart disease mortality among adult cancer patients: a nationwide CDC WONDER analysis (1999-2020).Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEquity in access to and outcomes from healthcare is a fundamental pillar of universal healthcare systems. However, these systems have not eliminated social inequities in health. Significant socio-economic disparities persist in access to and utilisation of healthcare services, as well as in the quality and outcomes of care. The Social Health Bridge-Building Programme aims to enhance health equity by addressing multi-level barriers to healthcare. In this programme, healthcare student volunteers accompany individuals in a socially vulnerable situation to healthcare appointments, providing support before, during, and after these encounters. This reciprocal arrangement not only enhances the healthcare experience for the individuals involved but also offers student volunteers unique insights into the social determinants of health while fostering the development of essential communication skills. This study explores implementation perspectives of the programme, focusing on those accompanied to appointments.
methodsIndividuals accompanied to a healthcare appointment from August 2021 to June 2022 were asked to complete a web-based questionnaire covering socio-demographics, health literacy, physical and mental health, and satisfaction with the support provided. The frequency of accompaniments over six months were collected through telephone calls.
resultsA total of 187 users of the programme responded. The Individuals were characterised by short educational attainment, limited social support, unemployment, as well as poor physical and mental health. The majority reported difficulties comprehending health information and engaging with healthcare professionals. Forty percent of the accompaniments were to hospital visits and 23% to GP consultations, with most requesting multiple types of support such as emotional, transportation, communication, and way-finding. Most users (96%) reported that the student-volunteer accommodated their need for support. The additional number of accompaniments over six months ranged from 0 to 21.
conclusionsThe programme is successfully implemented for individuals in a socially vulnerable situation and succeeded in the delivery of a tailored programme that adresses the individuals' specific needs and request. High satisfaction rates and the positive impact on healthcare experiences highlight the programme's potential to bridge existing inequity gaps in healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.