Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39910552›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025

Management of extremity and pelvic fractures in earthquake: our observations and recommendations.

Bugra Kundakci, Akif Mirioglu, Bugra Eraslan, Hakki Can Olke, Mustafa Tekin, Melih Bagir, Yusuf Kemal Arslan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bugra KundakciDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey. bugrakundakci@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8343-5506
Akif MiriogluDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9686-4991
Bugra EraslanDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-9678-507X
Hakki Can OlkeDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Turgut Noyan Research and Training Centre, Baskent University, Adana, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4743-0169
Mustafa TekinDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3040-5239
Melih BagirDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3761-8774
Yusuf Kemal ArslanDepartment of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1308-8569

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarthquakes frequently cause injuries to the musculoskeletal system. Studies conducted after earthquakes often report on injured limbs, fractures, and surgeries. This study aimed to enhance preparedness for future earthquakes by acquiring knowledge about the prevalence of fractures and the relationship between fracture types and injury mechanisms.

methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on medical records of patients with fractures admitted to our hospital following the 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake. Patients with fractures resulting from traffic accidents or other causes unrelated to earthquakes were excluded. The recorded data included age, gender, fracture site, fracture type, mechanism of injury, date, duration of surgery, and peak creatine kinase (CK) level. The injury mechanisms were classified into four main categories: injured by falling objects, falling while running, falling from height, and being trapped under rubble. The study investigated the relationship between fractures and other factors.

resultsThe study included 185 patients with a mean age of 39.62 ± 20.83 years. The most frequent mechanism of injury was being trapped under rubble. In total, there were 214 fractures, with pelvic fractures being the most common (21.50% of all fractures). Tibia fractures were the most common fractures in the lower extremities (15.89%). Women had a significantly higher occurrence of pelvic fractures (33.3%) compared to men (14.5%) (p = 0.003). The frequency of pelvic fractures significantly increased as age decreased (p = 0.007). Patients with pelvic fractures had a significantly greater peak CK concentration (p = 0.006). Open fractures were more common in the first few days, and Kirschner wires were the first treatment applied at a mean of 74 h and external fixators at a mean of 94.3 h.

conclusionInjuries from falling objects from roofs and jumping from heights are important in earthquakes. In addition to lower extremity fractures, pelvic fractures are common in earthquake disasters. Most pelvic fractures are simple lateral compression fractures and it is important to follow the patients for crush syndrome in the first days instead of focusing on definitive fracture treatment. Open fractures should be prioritized for fracture surgery within the first few days. External fixators and Kirschner wires are recommended. Closed fractures should be treated conservatively and definitive surgical procedures should be postponed to the following weeks.

Indexed as

EarthquakesFractures, BonePelvic BonesTibial FracturesAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFracture FixationHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultExtremity FractureFebruary 2023Open FracturePelvic FractureTürkiye Earthquake

Identifiers

PMID39910552
PMCPMC11796015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.