Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39910547›Full record

SynthesisJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2025

Efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation interventions on cognitive impairment: an umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials.

Minmin Wu, Wenjing Song, Xue Wang, Lili Teng, Jinting Li, Jiongliang Zhang, Xinyue Li, Donghui Yu, Huanhuan Jia, Binhan Wang and 2 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Efficacy of transcranial alternating current stimulation on cognitive function in patients with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Minmin WuDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, China.
Wenjing SongDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, China.
Xue WangRehabilitation Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, China.
Lili TengDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, China.
Jinting LiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, China.
Jiongliang ZhangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, China.
Xinyue LiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, China.
Donghui YuDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, China.
Huanhuan JiaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, China.
Binhan WangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, China.
Qiang TangRehabilitation Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, China.
Luwen ZhuRehabilitation Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, China. zhuluwen1983@126.com.

Funding

Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine Outstanding Cultivation Fund Project 2019JC03Key Research and Development Program of Heilongjiang 2022ZX06C24National Key Research and Development Program of China 2023YFC3603902National Natural Science Foundation of China 82174477
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe impact of noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) on cognitive and mental outcomes in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) remains under debate due to contradictory findings from systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMAs). To synthesize evidence from SRMAs assessing the effectiveness of NIBS techniques on cognitive and mental outcomes in AD and MCI populations. By comparing our findings to recent reviews and clinical guidelines, we highlight how this study addresses current limitations in the literature, provides a more holistic perspective on NIBS interventions, and guides future research and clinical practice.

methodsWe searched four databases from inception to May 15, 2024, reviewing SRMAs that analyzed the effects of NIBS. Effect sizes, 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and prediction intervals were computed for each meta-analysis. The methodological quality of the SRMAs was evaluated using the Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2, and the quality of evidence was assessed through the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria.

findingsTen SRMAs detailing 22 associations were analyzed, focusing on two NIBS techniques across 12 unique outcomes. Significant improvements were observed in global cognition, language, executive function, and memory. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) significantly enhanced short-term global cognition (standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.44; 95% CI 0.02-0.86), language (SMD, 1.64; 95% CI 1.22-2.06), executive function (SMD, 1.64; 95% CI 0.18-0.83), and long-term global cognition (SMD, 0.29; 95% CI 0.07-0.50). Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) was effective in improving memory (SMD, 0.60; 95% CI 0.32-0.89) and executive function (SMD, 0.39; 95% CI 0.08-0.71). NIBS interventions showed no significant correlation with neuropsychiatric symptoms but demonstrated good tolerability in terms of safety and acceptability.

interpretationThis umbrella review indicates that NIBS techniques, particularly rTMS and tDCS, can significantly improve cognitive functions such as global cognition, language, executive functions, and memory in patients with AD and MCI. Despite potential benefits, results should be interpreted cautiously due to study heterogeneity and methodological limitations. Future studies should investigate their long-term effects and applicability across dementia types.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionTranscranial Direct Current StimulationTranscranial Magnetic StimulationHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeAlzheimer’s diseaseGRADEMild cognitive impairmentNon-invasive brain stimulationUmbrella review

Identifiers

PMID39910547
PMCPMC11796046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.