ArticleBMC pediatrics2025
Dupilumab in children with eosinophilic esophagitis: a retrospective multicenter study.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab in Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International archives of allergy and immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Advances in Management of Eosinophilic Esophagitis in Pediatrics.Paediatric drugs · 2026Review
- Clinical Patterns and Outcomes of Eosinophilic Esophagitis in Children and Adolescents at a Tertiary Care Center in Lebanon.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Eosinophilic Esophagitis in the Middle East: Insight From a Comprehensive Systematic Review.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic inflammatory disorder characterized by symptoms of esophageal dysfunction and eosinophil-predominant inflammation. Dupilumab is a human monoclonal antibody that targets both IL-4 and IL-13 signaling. It is currently indicated for the treatment of asthma, atopic dermatitis, and EoE. This study aimed to describe children with EoE that is difficult to treat using conventional treatment and to identify symptomatic, histological, and endoscopic improvements after dupilumab treatment. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe conducted a retrospective multicenter study in children with confirmed EoE and performed a chart review of patients prescribed dupilumab for EoE. Demographic information, symptoms, and medications including dupilumab treatment were collected. The endoscopic findings, histopathological features, and treatment results were analyzed. We calculated the change in EoE endoscopic reference scoring system (EREFS) scores from the baseline to 3 months.
resultsEleven patients were included in this study. The study population comprised seven boys (64%) and four girls (36%). The median age at presentation was 11.6 years (8-13 years). Dupilumab at a dose of 200-300 mg was administered to all patients as second-line therapy for children with EoE refractory to conventional therapy (proton pump inhibitors, corticosteroids, and dietary restrictions). Dupilumab efficacy regarding symptom relief, and endoscopic and histological improvements was 82%, 73%, and 90%, respectively. The mean EoE endoscopic reference scoring system scores changed from a baseline of 6.9 (before dupilumab) to 0.3 (after dupilumab). In addition to the improvement in EoE, the use of corticosteroids in EoE and inhaled corticosteroids in asthma was decreased for all patients, suggesting that dupilumab may be effective in patients with multiple concurrent atopic conditions. Dupilumab had a well-tolerated safety profile, except for one patient who developed conjunctivitis.
conclusionThis pediatric study demonstrates the effectiveness of dupilumab as a second-line therapy for symptom relief, and endoscopic and histological improvements of EoE that is refractory to current treatment. A longitudinal, large prospective study is necessary to guide the initiation of dupilumab treatment for childhood EoE, and long-term follow-up data on dupilumab are required. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.