Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39910505›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2025

Dupilumab in children with eosinophilic esophagitis: a retrospective multicenter study.

Mohammed Hasosah, Ghassan Sukkar, Asharf AlSahafi, Ali Zaidan, Nouf Ghous, Abdulmajed Alshahrani, Ziyad Al Zahrani, Naif Hasosah, Mansour Qurashi, Loie Goronfolah and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Eosinophilic Esophagitis in the Middle East: Insight From a Comprehensive Systematic Review.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Mohammed HasosahDepartment of pediatric gastroenterology, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center's (KAIMRC) National Guard Hospital, PO Box: 8202, Jeddah, 21482, Saudi Arabia. drhasosah2@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8434-2109
Ghassan SukkarDepartment of pediatric gastroenterology, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center's (KAIMRC) National Guard Hospital, PO Box: 8202, Jeddah, 21482, Saudi Arabia.
Asharf AlSahafiDepartment of pediatric gastroenterology, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center's (KAIMRC) National Guard Hospital, PO Box: 8202, Jeddah, 21482, Saudi Arabia.
Ali ZaidanDepartment of pediatric gastroenterology, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center's (KAIMRC) National Guard Hospital, PO Box: 8202, Jeddah, 21482, Saudi Arabia.
Nouf GhousDepartment of pediatric gastroenterology, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center's (KAIMRC) National Guard Hospital, PO Box: 8202, Jeddah, 21482, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulmajed AlshahraniDepartment of pediatric gastroenterology, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center's (KAIMRC) National Guard Hospital, PO Box: 8202, Jeddah, 21482, Saudi Arabia.
Ziyad Al ZahraniPediatric Gastroenterology Department, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Naif HasosahPediatric Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Mansour QurashiNeonatology Department,King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC), , Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Loie GoronfolahImmunology Department,King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Ali AlshariefFamily medicine Department, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences. King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC), National Guard Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Nagla KamalPediatric Gastroenterology Department, Alhada Armed Forces Hospital, Taif, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic inflammatory disorder characterized by symptoms of esophageal dysfunction and eosinophil-predominant inflammation. Dupilumab is a human monoclonal antibody that targets both IL-4 and IL-13 signaling. It is currently indicated for the treatment of asthma, atopic dermatitis, and EoE. This study aimed to describe children with EoE that is difficult to treat using conventional treatment and to identify symptomatic, histological, and endoscopic improvements after dupilumab treatment. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted a retrospective multicenter study in children with confirmed EoE and performed a chart review of patients prescribed dupilumab for EoE. Demographic information, symptoms, and medications including dupilumab treatment were collected. The endoscopic findings, histopathological features, and treatment results were analyzed. We calculated the change in EoE endoscopic reference scoring system (EREFS) scores from the baseline to 3 months.

resultsEleven patients were included in this study. The study population comprised seven boys (64%) and four girls (36%). The median age at presentation was 11.6 years (8-13 years). Dupilumab at a dose of 200-300 mg was administered to all patients as second-line therapy for children with EoE refractory to conventional therapy (proton pump inhibitors, corticosteroids, and dietary restrictions). Dupilumab efficacy regarding symptom relief, and endoscopic and histological improvements was 82%, 73%, and 90%, respectively. The mean EoE endoscopic reference scoring system scores changed from a baseline of 6.9 (before dupilumab) to 0.3 (after dupilumab). In addition to the improvement in EoE, the use of corticosteroids in EoE and inhaled corticosteroids in asthma was decreased for all patients, suggesting that dupilumab may be effective in patients with multiple concurrent atopic conditions. Dupilumab had a well-tolerated safety profile, except for one patient who developed conjunctivitis.

conclusionThis pediatric study demonstrates the effectiveness of dupilumab as a second-line therapy for symptom relief, and endoscopic and histological improvements of EoE that is refractory to current treatment. A longitudinal, large prospective study is necessary to guide the initiation of dupilumab treatment for childhood EoE, and long-term follow-up data on dupilumab are required. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedEosinophilic EsophagitisAdolescentChildFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizeddupilumabChildrenDupilumabEosinophilic esophagitis

Identifiers

PMID39910505
PMCPMC11796247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.