SynthesisBMC nephrology2025
Frailty risk prediction models for patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis in China: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Cognitive frailty risk prediction models in patients with chronic kidney disease in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC nephrology · 2026Pooled it
- Risk prediction models for postherpetic neuralgia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
- A Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI)-based frailty classification model for older maintenance hemodialysis patients: a cross-sectional study.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Self-perceptions of aging and associated factors among older patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis: a latent profile analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo promote the application of high-quality frailty risk prediction models in the field of debilitation among Chinese patients undergoing MHD, and to provide a basis for optimisation and improvement of future studies.
methodsA literature search was conducted in Chinese and English databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Embase, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, SinoMed) and the cutoff date for which was April 30, 2024. Literature characteristics, types of studies, predictors, model construction methods and results were analysed and compared.
resultsTen studies met the inclusion criteria, and seven were focused on model development and validation. A total of 12 predictive models were included across these 10 studies; three of these were solely model development studies, while seven were both model development and validation. The area under the curve (AUC) for the subjects' operating characteristics was > 0.7 in all ten studies. The most frequently identified predictors in the models included age, nutritional status, the presence of multimorbidity, gender, and depression. While the overall applicability of the ten studies was deemed satisfactory, it is important to note that all studies exhibited a high risk of bias, particularly concerning the data analysis component.
conclusionThe frailty risk prediction models for patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis have demonstrated satisfactory applicability; however, they are all associated with a significant risk of bias and lack comprehensive external validation. To develop more accurate and practical prediction models, future studies must rely on large-sample, multicenter prospective cohort studies and adhere to a rigorous study design. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.