Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39910459›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025

Comparison of live birth rate and fetal outcomes between fresh embryo and frozen-thawed embryo transfers: a prospective study.

Seyedeh Farinaz Fattahpour, Parvin Hakimi, Fatemeh Tabatabaei, Mahsa Hejazad, Maryam Amoozadeh, Leila Sadeghi, Negin Rezaie, Razih Vejdani, Hosein Azizi

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Seyedeh Farinaz FattahpourWomen's Reproductive Health Research Center, School of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Parvin HakimiWomen's Reproductive Health Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran. parvin.hakimi56@gmail.com.
Fatemeh TabatabaeiWomen's Reproductive Health Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Mahsa HejazadWomen's Reproductive Health Research Center, School of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Maryam AmoozadehWomen's Reproductive Health Research Center, School of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Leila SadeghiWomen's Reproductive Health Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Negin RezaieWomen's Reproductive Health Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Razih VejdaniWomen's Reproductive Health Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Hosein AziziWomen's Reproductive Health Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran. aziziepid@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe study aimed to compare the pregnancy, prenatal, and postnatal outcomes between fresh and frozen embryo transfer (ET) in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles at Al-Zahra Referral Women's Hospital in northwest Iran.

methodsA prospective study was conducted among all infertile women (N = 469) who underwent embryo transfer between 2018 and 23 at Al-Zahra referral infertility center. Patients in cycles with fresh embryo transfer and patients for whom frozen embryos were transferred were compared in terms of live birth rate and fetal outcomes. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

resultsThe majority of the participants were primary infertility 83.3%. The rate of chemical and clinical pregnancy was (21.8% vs. 17.2%) and (19% vs. 13.4%) in the fresh embryo and the frozen embryo transfers, respectively. Likewise, the rate of live births was (14.1% vs. 9.1%), respectively. The number of retrieved oocytes was significantly higher in frozen ET compared to fresh ET (P = 0.001). In the final analysis, after adjusting for potential confounders, no significant associations were found for clinical pregnancy (AOR = 1.51; 95% CI: 0.90-2.5; P = 0.125) and chemical pregnancy (AOR = 1.31; 95% CI: 0.81-2.3; P = 0.238) rates between fresh and frozen ETs. Similarly, there were no significant differences in live birth rate (AOR = 1.6; 95% CI: 0.54-12.4), preterm birth (AOR = 0.62; 95% CI: 0.33-5.5), and primary infertility (AOR = 0.73; 95% CI: 0.34-1.6) between fresh and frozen ETs. The incidence of multiple pregnancies and spontaneous abortion was (5% vs. 13.8%) and (22.2% vs. 30.2%) in the fresh embryo and frozen embryo groups, respectively.

conclusionNo significant differences in perinatal and postnatal outcomes were found between fresh and frozen embryo transfers.

Indexed as

CryopreservationEmbryo TransferInfertility, FemaleLive BirthAdultBirth RateFemaleHumansIranPregnancyPregnancy OutcomePregnancy RateProspective StudiesSperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicAssisted reproductive technologyInfertilityReproductiveSperm intracytoplasmic injectionWomen's health

Identifiers

PMID39910459
PMCPMC11800545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.