ArticleBMC plant biology2025
Optimized framework for evaluating F3 transgressive segregants in cayenne pepper.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integration of gamma irradiation breeding from doubled haploid and systematic screening to develop adapted rice mutants under salinity stress.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Correction: Optimized framework for evaluating F3 transgressive segregants in cayenne pepper.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Developing F3 transgenic segregants has significant potential to improve cayenne pepper varieties. However, current evaluation methods are often inconsistent and inaccurate, hindering the identification of effective traits. Traditional approaches only focus on a few aspects, thus not covering the full potential performance of the genotype. Utilizing morphometric image processing and categorical parameter assessment can fill the gap of traditional approaches to improving accuracy and objectivity in evaluation. In addition, environmental factors affecting the evaluation process are not adequately considered, making the results unreliable. Therefore, a systematic evaluation framework integrating morphometric analysis, categorical assessment, and environmental correction is essential for optimizing F3 cayenne transgressive segregants. The study aims to develop a synchronized assessment and selection approach based on agronomic, fruit morphometric, and categorical traits in evaluating F3 cayenne transgressive segregants. This research was designed with a randomized completed block design with 16 transgressive segregant genotypes and three check varieties. Each genotype was repeated three times, resulting in 57 experimental units. Based on the results of this study, quantitative and categorical indices could be used to selectively and systematically evaluate potential transgressive segregants in F3 cayenne peppers. The quantitative index is formed from outcome selection criteria, number of productive branches, area, and major axes weighted through an unbiased linear estimation approach, heritability, and best path analysis. Seven genotypes demonstrated superior transgressive performance based on quantitative indices, with G10.9.2, G10.7.1, and G6.8.5 excelling in both agronomic traits and categorical evaluations. These lines can be recommended for yield evaluation and hybrid cross-parents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.