ArticleBMC genomics2025
Fine-tuning GBS data with comparison of reference and mock genome approaches for advancing genomic selection in less studied farmed species.
Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDiversifying animal cultivation demands efficient genotyping for enabling genomic selection, but non-model species lack efficient genotyping solutions. The aim of this study was to optimize a genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) double-digest RAD-sequencing (ddRAD) pipeline. Bovine data was used to automate the bioinformatic analysis. The application of the optimization was demonstrated on non-model European whitefish data.
resultsDdRAD data generation was designed for a reliable estimation of relatedness and is scalable to up to 384 samples. The GBS sequencing yielded approximately one million reads for each of the around 100 assessed samples. Optimizing various strategies to create a de-novo reference genome for variant calling (mock reference) showed that using three samples outperformed other building strategies with single or very large number of samples. Adjustments to most pipeline tuning parameters had limited impact on high-quality data, except for the identity criterion for merging mock reference genome clusters. For each species, over 15k GBS variants based on the mock reference were obtained and showed comparable results with the ones called using an existing reference genome. Repeatability analysis showed high concordance over replicates, particularly in bovine while in European whitefish data repeatability did not exceed earlier observations.
conclusionsThe proposed cost-effective ddRAD strategy, coupled with an efficient bioinformatics workflow, enables broad adoption of ddRAD GBS across diverse farmed species. While beneficial, a reference genome is not obligatory. The integration of Snakemake streamlines the pipeline usage on computer clusters and supports customization. This user-friendly solution facilitates genotyping for both model and non-model species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.