Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39910437›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2025

Fine-tuning GBS data with comparison of reference and mock genome approaches for advancing genomic selection in less studied farmed species.

Daniel Fischer, Miika Tapio, Oliver Bitz, Terhi Iso-Touru, Antti Kause, Ilma Tapio

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel FischerApplied Statistical Methods, Natural Resources, Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Jokioinen, 31600, Finland. daniel.fischer@luke.fi.
Miika TapioGenomics and Breeding, Production Systems, Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Jokioinen, 31600, Finland.
Oliver BitzGenomics and Breeding, Production Systems, Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Jokioinen, 31600, Finland.
Terhi Iso-TouruGenomics and Breeding, Production Systems, Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Jokioinen, 31600, Finland.
Antti KauseGenomics and Breeding, Production Systems, Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Jokioinen, 31600, Finland.
Ilma TapioGenomics and Breeding, Production Systems, Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Jokioinen, 31600, Finland.

Funding

Academy of Finland 317998Kolarctic CBC Programme 2014-2020 4/2018/095/KO4058Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke) 41007-00155500 and 41007-00215600
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiversifying animal cultivation demands efficient genotyping for enabling genomic selection, but non-model species lack efficient genotyping solutions. The aim of this study was to optimize a genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) double-digest RAD-sequencing (ddRAD) pipeline. Bovine data was used to automate the bioinformatic analysis. The application of the optimization was demonstrated on non-model European whitefish data.

resultsDdRAD data generation was designed for a reliable estimation of relatedness and is scalable to up to 384 samples. The GBS sequencing yielded approximately one million reads for each of the around 100 assessed samples. Optimizing various strategies to create a de-novo reference genome for variant calling (mock reference) showed that using three samples outperformed other building strategies with single or very large number of samples. Adjustments to most pipeline tuning parameters had limited impact on high-quality data, except for the identity criterion for merging mock reference genome clusters. For each species, over 15k GBS variants based on the mock reference were obtained and showed comparable results with the ones called using an existing reference genome. Repeatability analysis showed high concordance over replicates, particularly in bovine while in European whitefish data repeatability did not exceed earlier observations.

conclusionsThe proposed cost-effective ddRAD strategy, coupled with an efficient bioinformatics workflow, enables broad adoption of ddRAD GBS across diverse farmed species. While beneficial, a reference genome is not obligatory. The integration of Snakemake streamlines the pipeline usage on computer clusters and supports customization. This user-friendly solution facilitates genotyping for both model and non-model species.

Indexed as

GenomeGenomicsGenotyping TechniquesAnimalsCattleComputational BiologyGenotypeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingSequence Analysis, DNAAquacultureCattleGenotyping by sequencingRepeatabilitySnakemakeVariant calling

Identifiers

PMID39910437
PMCPMC11796084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.