ArticleBMC public health2025
Cancer mortality and sectors of employment: a cohort study in Italy.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCancer is a multifactorial disease. The large impact of occupational exposure on the burden of cancer continues to be a paramount public health concern that deserves more attention. The study aims to evaluate cancer-specific mortality risk in relation to sectors of employment.
methodsWe used a cohort from the Rome Longitudinal Study (ROL) and linked it with the National Social Insurance Agency (INPS) database to obtain working histories. We considered the longest duration of employment in a sector as a proxy of exposure, and insurance activities as the reference category. A Cox regression adjusted model was used to examine the associations between cancer-specific causes of death and the sector of employment in men and women. A similar analysis was performed considering the length of employment (≤ 10 years versus ≥ 10 years).
resultsThe study population comprised 910,559 (52% of the total population of the cohort after linkage with INPS) 30 + yr employees (53% men and 47% women) followed for a total period of approximately 7 million years. The outcomes confirmed some well-known associations (e.g. lung and pleura in construction, pleura in paper and printing, and lung in wood and leather) and suggested possible high-risk sectors that have not yet been thoroughly investigated. In men we observed an increased mortality risk for stomach cancer in the printing and paper industry (HR = 1.69, 95% CI:1.11-2.57) as well as for stomach and lung cancer in cleaning activities (HR = 1.98, 95% CI:1.13-3.49 and HR = 1.55, 95% CI:1.22-1.98, respectively). Among women, there was an elevated mortality risk in the cleaning industry for all malignant cancers (HR = 1.15, 95% CI:1.03-1.29), liver cancer (HR = 1.94, 95% CI:1.08-3.48) and cancer of the lympho-hematopoietic tissue (HR = 1.65, 95% CI:1.09-2.50).
conclusionsThe results showed an increased risk of cancer death in some traditional industrial sectors compared to the reference category of insurance activities such as construction and wood and leather products and limited evidence in sectors like cleaning, accommodation and food services and hairdressing. The adopted method proved to be effective in monitoring occupational risks and activating proper prevention initiatives and further insights.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.