Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39910390›Full record

ArticleNature2025

Emergence of collective oscillations in massive human crowds.

François Gu, Benjamin Guiselin, Nicolas Bain, Iker Zuriguel, Denis Bartolo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Noise-induced collective memory in schooling fish.Bioinspiration & biomimetics · 2026
    Article
  6. Topological signatures of collective dynamics and turbulent-like energy cascades in apolar active granular matter.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Sociohydrodynamics: Data-driven modeling of social behavior.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Lane formation in criss-crossing crowds.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

François GuENS de Lyon, CNRS, LPENSL, UMR5672, Lyon, France.ORCID 0009-0007-8653-9443
Benjamin GuiselinENS de Lyon, CNRS, LPENSL, UMR5672, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4663-2578
Nicolas BainUniversite Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, Institut Lumière Matière, UMR5306, Villeurbanne, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3474-7244
Iker ZuriguelDepartamento de Física y Matemática Aplicada, Facultad de Ciencias, Unversidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4890-0476
Denis BartoloENS de Lyon, CNRS, LPENSL, UMR5672, Lyon, France. denis.bartolo@ens-lyon.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-5035-6898

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dense crowds form some of the most dangerous environments in modern society

Indexed as

CrowdingDisastersHumansModels, TheoreticalSpain

Identifiers

PMID39910390
PMCPMC11798876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.