Performance evaluation and application of second-generation environmentally-friendly composite dust suppressant in dust control.

Yong Xu, Yanghaoxu Wu, Ben Ma, Yingda Zhang, Yujie Fan, Xin Huang, Zihao Liu

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yong XuSchool of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Xihua University, Chengdu, 610039, China.

Yanghaoxu WuSchool of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Xihua University, Chengdu, 610039, China.

Ben MaSchool of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Xihua University, Chengdu, 610039, China.

Yingda ZhangSchool of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Xihua University, Chengdu, 610039, China. yingda.zhang@xhu.edu.cn.

Yujie FanSchool of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Xihua University, Chengdu, 610039, China.

Xin HuangSchool of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Xihua University, Chengdu, 610039, China.

Zihao LiuDepartment of Architecture, Faculty of Environmental Engineering, The University of Kitakyushu, 1-1 Hibikino Wakamatsu, Kitakyushu, 8080135, Fukuoka, Japan.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 52008340Xihua University Project RH2100002736 and Z231001

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study compares the performance of two generations of environmentally friendly composite dust suppressants, derived from plant straw, with two commercial suppressants, water, and dust-proof netting. The aim is to address construction-related dust pollution while minimizing environmental impact. Through wind erosion resistance tests under simulated high-wind conditions, the second-generation suppressant at 2 L/m

Indexed as

Dust suppressantsEnvironmental protection composite typeGermination ratePlant growth rateSoil testWind erosion resistance

Identifiers

PMID39910343

DOI10.1038/s41598-025-88620-1

PMCPMC11799424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY-NC-ND

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.