Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39910308›Full record

ArticleNature2025

Distributed quantum computing across an optical network link.

D Main, P Drmota, D P Nadlinger, E M Ainley, A Agrawal, B C Nichol, R Srinivas, G Araneda, D M Lucas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Customized Itinerant Frequency Combs by Cascaded Nonlinear Effects.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Utility-Scale Quantum Computational Chemistry.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. High-Rate Cross-Channel Entanglement Swapping Between Independent On-Chip Sources.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

D MainClarendon Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. dougal.main@physics.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8455-0859
P DrmotaClarendon Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2241-885X
D P NadlingerClarendon Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0219-274X
E M AinleyClarendon Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5999-6314
A AgrawalClarendon Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6200-9746
B C NicholClarendon Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4267-6255
R SrinivasClarendon Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8462-6072
G AranedaClarendon Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1128-2571
D M LucasClarendon Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Distributed quantum computing (DQC) combines the computing power of multiple networked quantum processing modules, ideally enabling the execution of large quantum circuits without compromising performance or qubit connectivity

Identifiers

PMID39910308
PMCPMC11821536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.