ArticleScientific reports2025
Body image of men and women with congenital heart disease over a 15 years observational period.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Living with congenital heart disease: a qualitative study to explore psychosocial impacts in adulthood.International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Most studies devoted to the psychological consequences of congenital heart disease (CHD) have dealt with consequences in terms of psychopathology. We wanted to consider two specific aspects of body image, "Rejecting body evaluation" and "Vital body dynamics". We examined body image of CHD-patients as compared with the general population, the stability of body image of patients over time, and the relationship of body image with disease severity. The study combined a longitudinal (panel-) and a case-control design. The findings were based on a long-term study of CHD-patients with two surveys about 15 years apart with N = 244 who participated in both. The control group consisted of the same number of cases matched by age, gender and education drawn from a national survey designed to examine body image in the general population. More men than women were classified into the group with severe CHD. Body image differences between CHD-patients and controls were found only in men, but not in women, and they emerged primarily in terms of vitality. The two dimensions of body image turned out as moderately to strongly stable over time, relationships between disease severity and body image emerged only for perceived vitality. Contrary to expectation, effects of age and sex were largely absent. The body image of men turned out to be more affected by congenital heart disease than women. Body image is not stable, but it is changing with increasing age, and disease severity is affecting body image only in terms of the perception of physical performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.