ArticleScientific reports2025
Codon usage patterns and genomic variation analysis of chloroplast genomes provides new insights into the evolution of Aroideae.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Structural characteristics of the Phoebe hui chloroplast genome and phylogenetic analyses of Phoebe plants.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Codon usage patterns and phylogenetic analysis of chloroplast genomes reveal evolutionary insights into Asphodelaceae species.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Comprehensive analysis of chloroplast genome evolution in Poaceae: codon usage patterns, selection pressures, and phylogenomic relationships.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Phylogenomics, divergence time estimation, and biogeography ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Characteristics, comparative genomics, and phylogenetic analysis of the chloroplast genome ofPeerJ · 2026Article
- Comparative chloroplast genomics reveals codon usage bias, simple sequence repeat dynamics, and phylogenomic relationships in Urticaceae.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Comparative complete chloroplast genome analysis ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Article
- The Complete Chloroplast Genome ofGenes · 2025Article
- Plastome diversity and phylogenetic insights among modern Egyptian wheat cultivars: Genome-Wide and Gene-Level perspectives.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Integrative Physiological, Metabolomic and Transcriptomic Analyses Uncover the Mechanisms Underlying Differential Responses of TwoBiomolecules · 2025Article
- Plastome phylogenomics of the Korean endemic plant Arisaema thunbergii subsp. geomundoense (Araceae).Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Codon Usage Bias Analysis in the Chloroplast Genome ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025Article
- Comparative plastome analysis reveals evolutionary dynamics and codon usage patterns in Bidens (Asteraceae).Functional & integrative genomics · 2025Article
- Complete Chloroplast Genome Analysis ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Diverse climbing strategies in aroid vines: functional adaptations and environmental drivers.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
- Chloroplast genome analysis and phylogenetic position of Polygonatum sinopubescens and comparison with related species.PloS one · 2025Article
- Phylogenetic analysis of nineFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aroideae is an important subfamily of the Araceae family and contains many plants with medicinal and edible value. It is difficult to identify and classify Aroideae species accurately on the basis of morphology alone because of their polymorphic phenotypic traits. The chloroplast genome (CPG) is useful for studying on plant taxonomy and phylogeny, and the analysis of codon usage bias (CUB) in CPGs provides further insights into the intricate phylogenetic relationships among Aroideae. The results showed that the codon third position of the chloroplast genome coding sequence in Aroideae was rich in A and T, with a GC content of 37.91%. The ENC-plot and PR2-plot revealed that the codon usage bias of Aroideae was influenced by multiple factors, with natural selection as the dominant factor. Thirteen to twenty optimal codons ending in A/T were identified in 61 Aroideae species. Additionally, the comparative analysis of CPGs revealed that two single copy regions and non-coding regions were variable in Aroideae. Eight highly divergent regions (Pi > 0.064) were identified (ndhF, rpl32, ccsA, ndhE, ndhG, ndhF-rpl32, ccsA-ndhD, and ndhE-ndhG) , in which ndhE have the potential to serve as a reliable DNA marker to discriminate chloroplasts in Aroideae subfamily. Furthermore, the maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic trees constructed from complete chloroplast genomes and protein-coding sequences presented similar topologies. Principal component clustering analysis based on relative synonymous codon usage values (RSCUs) revealed that Calla was clearly deviated from Montrichardia and Anubias, and that Alocasia was closer to Colocasieae than to Arisaemateae. These findings suggest that the use of RSCU for clustering analysis could offer new theoretical support for species classification and evolution. Our research could provide a theoretical foundation for the chloroplast genetic engineering, taxonomy, and phylogenetic relationships of Aroideae chloroplasts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.