Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39910228›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Leveraging paired mammogram views with deep learning for comprehensive breast cancer detection.

Jae Won Seo, Young Jae Kim, Kwang Gi Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jae Won SeoDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology, GAIHST, Gachon University, Incheon, 21999, Republic of Korea.
Young Jae KimDepartment of Gachon Biomedical & Convergence Institute, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, 21565, Republic of Korea.
Kwang Gi KimDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology, GAIHST, Gachon University, Incheon, 21999, Republic of Korea. kimkg@gachon.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Employing two standard mammography views is crucial for radiologists, providing comprehensive insights for reliable clinical evaluations. This study introduces paired mammogram view based-network(PMVnet), a novel algorithm designed to enhance breast lesion detection by integrating relational information from paired whole mammograms, addressing the limitations of current methods. Utilizing 1,636 private mammograms, PMVnet combines cosine similarity and the squeeze-and-excitation method within a U-shaped architecture to leverage correlated information. Performance comparisons with single view-based models with VGGnet16, Resnet50, and EfficientnetB5 as encoders revealed PMVnet's superior capability. Using VGGnet16, PMVnet achieved a Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) of 0.709 in segmentation and a recall of 0.950 at 0.156 false positives per image (FPPI) in detection tasks, outperforming the single-view model, which had a DSC of 0.579 and a recall of 0.813 at 0.188 FPPI. These findings demonstrate PMVnet's effectiveness in reducing false positives and avoiding missed true positives, suggesting its potential as a practical tool in computer-aided diagnosis systems. PMVnet can significantly enhance breast lesion detection, aiding radiologists in making more precise evaluations and improving patient outcomes. Future applications of PMVnet may offer substantial benefits in clinical settings, improving patient care through enhanced diagnostic accuracy.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDeep LearningMammographyRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsFemaleHumansArtificial intelligenceBreastComputer-aided diagnostic systemDetectionMammogram

Identifiers

PMID39910228
PMCPMC11799187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.