ArticleScientific reports2025
Geospatial digital mapping of soil organic carbon using machine learning and geostatistical methods in different land uses.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Productivity-based sampling for field-scale soil organic carbon mapping: from regional models to carbon farming needs.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2026Article
- Machine learning ensemble technique for exploring soil type evolution.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Improper management of soil resources leads to the destruction of soil organic carbon (SOC) stock and, as a result, the reduction of soil quality, as well as accelerating the process of climate change through the release of SOC into the atmosphere. This study was conducted to evaluate potential of different simulation models to map the spatial variability of SOC as affected by land use in a study area in Qarasu watershed in Kermanshah province, west of Iran. Map of sampling points was prepared using the Latin hypercube sampling method. A total of 168 observation points were selected and the soil profile was dug and described in these points. The soil samples were taken in different horizon to determine the SOC content in laboratory. SOC was mapped using kriging geostatistical method in the study area. The SOC changes were simulated using multivariate analysis and machine learning methods including generalized linear model (GLM), linear additive model (LAM), cubist, random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM) models. Comprehensive measurement data is utilized to develop and validate the predictive models. Predictor variables included 16 topographic variables as well as two vegetation, six parent material, and four climatic variables. In-depth statistical analyses are proposed to evaluate the proposed models performance. The results showed that the SOC content ranged from 0.19 to 8.44 percent in different land uses. The spherical variogram model with MAE = 0.41 best fits to interpolate and map SOC using ordinary kriging in different land uses. The LAM method was estimated wider range of the SOC change (SOC = 0.18-4.82%) among different simulation model. However, the RF model (R2 = 0.64 and RMSE = 0.58%) was the most accurate in predicting SOC quantity comparing the other simulation models. It can be used as a reliable simulation model to predict SOC variability in the study area and other similar semiarid regions of West Asia in different land uses. Among the different predictor variables, the parent material's intrinsic soil properties and topography variables had the greatest effect in predicting soil organic carbon variability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.