ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning for classifying chronic kidney disease and predicting creatinine levels using at-home measurements.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Applications of artificial intelligence in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review.Revista de saude publica · 2026Pooled it
- Applications of Machine Learning for Early Diagnosis and Prognosis of Chronic Kidney Disease: Current Evidence.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Prediction of Chronic Kidney Disease Based on Simulated Serum Analysis by Vibrational Spectroscopy.Biosensors · 2026Article
- Emerging Urinary Biomarkers and Innovative Technologies for the Early Detection and Personalized Management of Chronic Kidney Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Assessment of Blood Glucose Measurement Using New Noninvasive Technology: Protocol and Methodology.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Recent advancements and future prospects on AI-integrated sensing techniques for non-invasive chronic kidney disease diagnosis: a review.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a global health concern with early detection playing a pivotal role in effective management. Machine learning models demonstrate promise in CKD detection, yet the impact on detection and classification using different sets of clinical features remains under-explored. In this study, we focus on CKD classification and creatinine prediction using three sets of features: at-home, monitoring, and laboratory. We employ artificial neural networks (ANNs) and random forests (RFs) on a dataset of 400 patients with 25 input features, which we divide into three feature sets. Using 10-fold cross-validation, we calculate metrics such as accuracy, true positive rate (TPR), true negative rate (TNR), and mean squared error. Our results reveal RF achieves superior accuracy (92.5%) in at-home CKD classification over ANNs (82.9%). ANNs achieve a higher TPR (92.0%), but a lower TNR (67.9%) compared with RFs (90.0% and 95.8%, respectively). For monitoring and laboratory features, both methods achieve accuracies exceeding 98%. The R2 score for creatinine regression is approximately 0.3 higher with laboratory features than at-home features. Feature importance analysis identifies the key clinical variables hemoglobin and blood urea, and key comorbidities hypertension and diabetes mellitus, in agreement with previous studies. Machine learning models, particularly RFs, exhibit promise in CKD diagnosis and highlight significant features in CKD detection. Moreover, such models may assist in screening a general population using at-home features-potentially increasing early detection of CKD, thus improving patient care and offering hope for a more effective approach to managing this prevalent health condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.