Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39910170›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Machine learning for classifying chronic kidney disease and predicting creatinine levels using at-home measurements.

Brady Metherall, Anna K Berryman, Georgia S Brennan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Brady MetherallMathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Andrew Wiles Building, Woodstock Rd, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK. metherall@maths.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-3197-4345
Anna K BerrymanMathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Andrew Wiles Building, Woodstock Rd, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.ORCID 0009-0003-4798-7594
Georgia S BrennanMathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Andrew Wiles Building, Woodstock Rd, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4914-5716

Funding

EPSRC EP/L015803/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a global health concern with early detection playing a pivotal role in effective management. Machine learning models demonstrate promise in CKD detection, yet the impact on detection and classification using different sets of clinical features remains under-explored. In this study, we focus on CKD classification and creatinine prediction using three sets of features: at-home, monitoring, and laboratory. We employ artificial neural networks (ANNs) and random forests (RFs) on a dataset of 400 patients with 25 input features, which we divide into three feature sets. Using 10-fold cross-validation, we calculate metrics such as accuracy, true positive rate (TPR), true negative rate (TNR), and mean squared error. Our results reveal RF achieves superior accuracy (92.5%) in at-home CKD classification over ANNs (82.9%). ANNs achieve a higher TPR (92.0%), but a lower TNR (67.9%) compared with RFs (90.0% and 95.8%, respectively). For monitoring and laboratory features, both methods achieve accuracies exceeding 98%. The R2 score for creatinine regression is approximately 0.3 higher with laboratory features than at-home features. Feature importance analysis identifies the key clinical variables hemoglobin and blood urea, and key comorbidities hypertension and diabetes mellitus, in agreement with previous studies. Machine learning models, particularly RFs, exhibit promise in CKD diagnosis and highlight significant features in CKD detection. Moreover, such models may assist in screening a general population using at-home features-potentially increasing early detection of CKD, thus improving patient care and offering hope for a more effective approach to managing this prevalent health condition.

Indexed as

CreatinineMachine LearningRenal Insufficiency, ChronicAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerCreatinineAt-home detectionChronic kidney disease classificationCreatinine predictionMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID39910170
PMCPMC11799517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.