ArticleScientific reports2025
Constructing a machine learning model for systemic infection after kidney stone surgery based on CT values.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting SIRS after PCNL using machine learning: the joint impact of sarcopenia and staghorn stones.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Development of a calibrated logistic regression clinical risk score for predicting postoperative sepsis following retrograde intrarenal surgery.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Identification of risk factors and construction of a nomogram for predicting postoperative stone recurrence in patients with infective upper urinary tract stones.BMC urology · 2026Article
- Comment on "Clinical management implications from 33,579 urinary stones: novel patterns in composition, comorbidities, seasonal variation, and machine learning-based urosepsis prediction".International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for predicting postoperative fever after flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a single-center retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- A roadmap for artificial intelligence in pain medicine: current status, opportunities, and requirements.Current opinion in anaesthesiology · 2025Review
- Construction and validation of a urinary stone composition prediction model based on machine learning.Urolithiasis · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based prediction model for arteriovenous fistula thrombosis risk: a retrospective cohort study from 2017 to 2024.BMC nephrology · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a machine learning-based prediction model for urinary calculi recurrence.Urolithiasis · 2025Article
- Predictive value of the stone-free rate after percutaneous nephrolithotomy based on multiple machine learning models.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to develop a machine learning model utilizing Computed Tomography (CT) values to predict systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) after endoscopic surgery for kidney stones. The goal is to identify high-risk patients early and provide valuable guidance for urologists in the early diagnosis and intervention of post-operative urosepsis. This study included 833 patients who underwent retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) or percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for kidney stones. Five machine learning algorithms and ten preoperative or intraoperative variables were used to develop a predictive model for SIRS. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was used to explain the distribution of feature importance in the model's predictions. Among the 833 patients, 126 (15.1%) developed SIRS postoperatively. All five machine learning models demonstrated strong discrimination on the validation set (AUC: 0.690-0.858). The eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model was the best performer [AUC: 0.858; sensitivity: 0.877; specificity: 0.981; accuracy: 0.841; positive predictive value: 0.629; negative predictive value: 0.851]. The characteristic importance of the Machine Learning model (ML model) and SHAP results indicated Hounsfield Unit (HU), Urinary protein, Stone burden, and Serum uric acid as important predictors for the model. A machine learning model utilizing CT values was developed to predict postoperative SIRS in endoscopic kidney stone surgery. The model demonstrates strong predictive performance and can assist in assessing the risk of urosepsis in postoperative patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.