ArticleScientific reports2025
PIPENN-EMB ensemble net and protein embeddings generalise protein interface prediction beyond homology.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- BindPred: a framework for predicting protein-protein binding affinity from language model embeddings.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Optimizing genomic language models for promoter prediction: a comparative study of tokenization and cross-species learning.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Protein language models enable accurate viral host range prediction.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein interactions are crucial for understanding biological functions and disease mechanisms, but predicting these remains a complex task in computational biology. Increasingly, Deep Learning models are having success in interface prediction. This study presents PIPENN-EMB which explores the added value of using embeddings from the ProtT5-XL protein language model. Our results show substantial improvement over the previously published PIPENN model for protein interaction interface prediction, reaching an MCC of 0.313 vs. 0.249, and AUROC 0.800 vs. 0.755 on the BIO_DL_TE test set. We furthermore show that these embeddings cover a broad range of 'hand-crafted' protein features in ablation studies. PIPENN-EMB reaches state-of-the-art performance on the ZK448 dataset for protein-protein interface prediction. We showcase predictions on 25 resistance-related proteins from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Furthermore, whereas other state-of-the-art sequence-based methods perform worse for proteins that have little recognisable homology in their training data, PIPENN-EMB generalises to remote homologs, yielding stable AUROC across all three test sets with less than 30% sequence identity to the training dataset, and even to proteins with less than 15% sequence identity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.