Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39910125›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Identification of degradation risk areas and delineation of key ecological function areas in Qinling region.

Xiaojuan Xu, Dayi Lin, Yue Yang, Jing Liu, Changxin Zou, Naifeng Lin, Fusheng Jiao, Qian Wu, Jie Qiu, Kun Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xiaojuan Xu *Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, MEE, Nanjing, 210042, China. kattyxiaoj@163.com.
Dayi Lin *Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, MEE, Nanjing, 210042, China.
Yue YangNanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, MEE, Nanjing, 210042, China.
Jing LiuNanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, MEE, Nanjing, 210042, China.
Changxin ZouNanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, MEE, Nanjing, 210042, China.
Naifeng LinNanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, MEE, Nanjing, 210042, China.
Fusheng JiaoSchool of Geography, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, 210023, China.
Qian WuNanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, MEE, Nanjing, 210042, China.
Jie QiuNanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, MEE, Nanjing, 210042, China. qiujie@nies.org.
Kun ZhangNanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, MEE, Nanjing, 210042, China. zhangkun@nies.org.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 42101103Special Fund of the Chinese Central Government for Basic Scientific Research Operations in the commonweal Research Institute GYZX210405, GYZX240304the Special Fund of the Jiangsu for Carbon Peak and Carbon Neutralization Science and Technology Innovation BK20220021Youth Foundation in the Jiangsu Province of China BK20220205, BK20240207
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a critical component of the geographical divide between the northern and southern regions of China, the ecological stability of the Qinling region has profound implications for ecological balance within China and across East Asia. However, the degradation risk areas of the Qinling region remain unclear, and there are gaps in the delineation of key ecological protection areas. This study examines the improvement and decline in the Qinling region from 2000 to 2023 in terms of ecosystem patterns, quality, and functions. Moreover, key ecological function and degradation risk zones were identified, and future development paths were proposed for the Qinling region. The findings indicate that: (1) Urban area expansion was the most rapid, increasing by about 1800 km², with an average yearly growth rate of 2.43%. Ecosystem quality increased in 48.07% of the Qinling region. The degradation risk zones of ecosystem quality and function were primarily located in the Sanjiangyuan, the Minshan-Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, and the Loess Plateau in Shaanxi, Henan, and Gansu. The core areas for water and soil conservation only accounted for 17.92% and 10.47%, respectively, mainly distributed across the Qinling-Daba Mountains. Based on ecological patterns, quality, functions, and ecological protection and restoration projects, the Qinling region has been divided into two majority categories and 16 subcategories: 7 ecologically key functional areas and 9 degradation risk areas. This study offers recommendations for formulating ecological protection and restoration policies, thereby promoting the sustainable development of the region's ecology and economy.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemChinaEcologySoilSoilDegradation risk zonesEcological function zonesEcosystem patternsEcosystem quality

Identifiers

PMID39910125
PMCPMC11799172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.